98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To compare usage patterns and outcomes of a nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU and a resident-staffed physician medical ICU.
Design: Retrospective chart review of 1,157 medical ICU admissions from March 2012 to February 2013.
Setting: Large urban academic university hospital.
Subjects: One thousand one hundred fifty-seven consecutive medical ICU admissions including 221 nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU admissions (19.1%) and 936 resident-staffed medical ICU admissions (80.9%).
Interventions: None.
Measurements And Main Results: Data obtained included age, gender, race, medical ICU admitting diagnosis, location at time of ICU transfer, code status at ICU admission, and severity of illness using both Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores and a model for relative expected mortality. Primary outcomes compared included ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, medical ICU length of stay, and post-ICU discharge hospital length of stay. Patients admitted to the nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU were older (63 ± 16.5 vs 59.2 ± 16.9 yr for resident-staffed medical ICU; p = 0.019), more likely to be transferred from an inpatient unit (52.0% vs 40.0% for the resident-staffed medical ICU; p = 0.002), and had a higher severity of illness by relative expected mortality (21.3 % vs 17.2 % for the resident-staffed medical ICU; p = 0.001). There were no differences among primary outcomes except for medical ICU length of stay (nurse practitioner-resident-staffed 7.9 ± 7.5 d vs resident-staffed medical ICU 5.6 ± 6.5 d; p = 0.0001). Post-hospital discharge to nonhome location was also significantly higher in the nurse practitioner-ICU (31.7% in nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU vs 23.9% in resident-staffed medical ICU; p = 0.24).
Conclusions: We found no difference in mortality between an nurse practitioner-staffed medical ICU and a resident-staffed physician medical ICU. Our study adds further evidence that advanced practice providers can render safe and effective ICU care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002055 | DOI Listing |
BMC Nurs
September 2025
Nursing Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Background: Nursing interns frequently encounter role ambiguity due to a mismatch between their expectations of the professional nursing role and the actual responsibilities they face in clinical settings. While clinical rotations during the internship year are intended to enhance clinical confidence and competence, such ambiguity can undermine these goals.
Objective: To examine the relationship between internship clinical rotation and role ambiguity among nursing interns.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
September 2025
Emergency Department, Helios Spital, Überlingen, Germany.
Background: The increasing amount of data routinely collected on ICUs poses a challenge for clinicians which is aggravated with data-heavy therapies like Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy (CKRT). We developed the CKRT Supporting Software Prototype (CKRT-SSP), a clinical decision support system for use before, during and after CKRT. The aim of this user experience (UX) study was to prospectively evaluate CKRT-SSP in terms of usability, user experience, and workload in a simulated ICU setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Psychol (Amst)
September 2025
General Intensive Care Unit, Centre hospitalier de Lons-le-Saunier, France.
Background: The frequency of alexithymia among healthcare professionals is poorly understood. However, alexithymia is a construct of interest in health psychology due to its numerous negative associations with mental health.
Aim: The aim of this paper was to estimate the frequency of alexithymia among healthcare professionals in intensive care units and emergency services and to identify the relationship between alexithymia, coping strategies, mental health and painkiller consumption.
Crit Care Sci
September 2025
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus - Dresden, Sachsen, Germany.
The PROtective VEntilation (PROVE) Network is a globally-recognized collaborative research group dedicated to advancing research, education, and collaboration in the field of mechanical ventilation. Established to address critical questions in intraoperative and intensive care ventilation, the network focuses on improving outcomes for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in diverse settings, including operating rooms, intensive care units, burn units, and resource-limited environments in low- and middle-income countries. The PROVE Network is committed to generating high-quality evidence through a comprehensive portfolio of investigations, including randomized clinical trials, observational research, and meta-analyses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCrit Care Sci
September 2025
Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory, Brazilian Center for Research on Energy and Materials - Campinas (SP), Brazil.
Objective: To develop a score (Palineo score) to identify the palliative care needs of newborn patients admitted to a Brazilian neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary maternity hospital that serves as a reference center for high-risk pregnancies, ensuring timely follow-up by a specialist.
Methods: Patients were assessed by three specialists using a questionnaire that included the same clinical elements as those used for the Palineo score but did not assign scores to the criteria. The score was determined by the consensus reached by the specialists.