98%
921
2 minutes
20
Study Design: Systematic literature review and consensus expert opinion.
Objective: To provide recommendations on reconstructive constructs for large tumor resections of the spinal column. Four questions were studied: (1) What are the best reconstructive options for single versus multilevel resections? (2) Should short segment fixation be considered in primary tumor reconstruction? (3) How should reconstructive techniques differ at various regions of the spine? (4) Does planned postoperative radiation change the fusion strategy?
Summary Of Background Data: Primary spinal tumors requiring en bloc resection are rare. Most studies focus on disease-free survival and local recurrence rates. Few studies focus on reconstructive options and outcomes with respect to fusion rates and need for revision.
Methods: A literature search was performed from January 1990 to December 2013. Data were combined and construct survivorship summarized. A survey was administered to international spine tumor surgeons, evaluating reconstructive preferences.
Results: The search yielded 381 articles, 12 included in the final analysis. Revision rates for anterior reconstruction were similar for autogenous strut grafts (10%), cages (7.7%), and allograft strut grafts (8.3%). There were two reports of revision from short to long segment constructs and three reports of broken pedicle screws, one requiring revision. Expert survey results revealed that most surgeons preferred cages packed with morcelized allograft and autograft (75%) for anterior reconstruction of single-level vertebrectomies, and strut bone grafting at the cervicothoracic junction (65%) and when more than one vertebrae was resected in the mid-thoracic spine (75%). Surgeons may alter their fusion technique if postoperative radiation is planned.
Conclusion: Posterior reconstruction with at least two vertebral levels above and below is recommended. Cages should be used for single-level defects and structural bone graft alone, or in combination with a cage, should be used when spanning a defect greater than two vertebral bodies. Planned postoperative radiation may affect fusion strategy.
Level Of Evidence: N/A.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001835 | DOI Listing |
Head Neck
September 2025
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Background: Salvage surgery (SS) is one of the best treatment options for recurrent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) after prior definitive radiation.
Methods: A Medline literature search of articles on open (OSS) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the treatment of recurrent OPSCC was performed. Surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes were analyzed and compared.
Radiother Oncol
September 2025
Dept of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. Electronic address:
Background And Purpose: To date, no consensus guidelines have been published that systematically guide delineation of primary and nodal Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) in patients who require post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) for mucosal Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). As a result, significant individual, institutional and national variation exists in the way that CTVs are delineated in the post-operative setting, leading to considerable heterogeneity in radiotherapy treatment.
Methods: A multi-disciplinary group of experts convened by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) set-out principles for the multi-disciplinary management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).
J Refract Surg
September 2025
From the Department of Ophthalmology at University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Purpose: To analyze stabilization results using various standard and accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) protocols in patients younger than 18 years.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A bibliographic search was carried out based on PubMed and Scopus data, with the last being performed in December 2024.
Curr Opin Urol
September 2025
European Association of Urology Section of Endourology (ESEUT), Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Purpose Of Review: This opinion article from the EAU Endourology Section critically summarizes the existing evidence on flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) to determine if they represent a paradigm shift in managing kidney and ureteral stones with flexible ureteroscopy (FURS). This scoping review aims to synthesize recent findings on FANS efficacy, safety, and potential to overcome limitations of conventional ureteral access sheath (C-UAS) and other modalities.
Recent Findings: Current evidence demonstrates FANS significantly outperforms C-UAS.
Surg Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan.
Introduction: Brain metastasis from gastric cancer is rare (0.5%) and often occurs with metastasis to other organs. We herein describe a very rare patient with a solitary brain metastasis from residual gastric cancer with no metastasis to other organs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF