A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Corneal Cross-linking in Pediatric Populations: Systematic Review and Future Perspectives. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To analyze stabilization results using various standard and accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) protocols in patients younger than 18 years.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A bibliographic search was carried out based on PubMed and Scopus data, with the last being performed in December 2024. Thirty-five articles were eligible for this review. To assess the effectiveness of CXL in children, maximum keratometry measurements were analyzed preoperatively and compared with postoperative values.

Results: A total of 2,186 eyes were included in this review. This review consisted of 15 studies with the standard CXL protocol, 11 with the accelerated CXL protocol, and 9 comparative protocols. Standard and accelerated CXL protocols and comparative studies were analyzed separately. Most studies have shown stabilization rates greater than 80% with different CXL protocols. Factors such as younger age, severity of keratoconus, and cone eccentricity seem to influence the effectiveness of the procedure.

Conclusions: The results indicate that standard and accelerated CXL are effective and safe therapeutic options for treating keratoconus in pediatric population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250624-03DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

standard accelerated
12
cxl protocols
12
accelerated cxl
12
corneal cross-linking
8
systematic review
8
cxl protocol
8
cxl
7
review
5
cross-linking pediatric
4
pediatric populations
4

Similar Publications