98%
921
2 minutes
20
To systematically assess the effect of metformin on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles before August 2015. Two investigators identified and extracted data independently. We adopted adjusted estimates to calculate summary estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) using either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the pooled results. The risk of publication bias was assessed by examining funnel plot asymmetry as well as Begg test and Egger test. Fifteen studies on CRC incidence and 6 studies on CRC survival were finally included in our meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of observational studies illustrated that a slight 10% reduction of CRC incidence was associated with metformin use (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96). Furthermore, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) revealed an improved survival outcome for metformin users in CRC patients compared to nonusers (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-081). There was no publication bias across studies. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that metformin therapy could slightly reduce CRC incidence and moderately improve the survival outcomes in patients with T2DM. More prospective studies are warranted to certify this protective association.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998616 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002749 | DOI Listing |
Public Health
September 2025
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Objectives: Participation rates in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening differ across socio-demographic subgroups. The largest health gains could be achieved in subgroups with low participation rates and high risk of CRC. We investigated the CRC risk within different socio-demographic subgroups with low participation in the Dutch CRC screening program.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The goal was to explore the impact of the NR1D1 gene on the occurrence, development, and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) using bioinformatics approaches.
Methods: CRC transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA were analyzed to compare NR1D1 expression in tumors and various clinical stages. Survival differences between high and low NR1D1 expression groups were assessed using the R survival package.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken)
September 2025
Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Background And Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and early detection reduce mortality. Curative treatment is based on surgical resection, and pathological analysis plays a key role in management. In Lebanon, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare has been compounded by an unprecedented socio-economic crisis in 2020.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Med
September 2025
Rwanda Zambia Health Research Group, Center for Family Health Research/Project San Francisco, Kigali, Rwanda.
Risk of death for both mother and fetus following Ebola virus infection is extremely high. In this study, healthy women in Rwanda aged ≥18 years were randomized to two-dose Ebola vaccination (Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo) during pregnancy (group A) or postpartum (group B).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
September 2025
Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background: Our study represents the first effort in the Eastern Mediterranean Region to identify disparities in the quality of colorectal cancer (CRC) care in Iran.
Methods: We established a collaborative registry program for non-metastatic CRC patients to evaluate survival rates between teaching cancer centers (TCCs) and a high-volume, non-teaching, non-cancer center (NTNC). The study included a diverse patient population and considered various factors such as cancer stage, margin involvement, adherence to guidelines for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments, emergency surgeries, socioeconomic status, and risk of surgery.