Distal small bowel bypass for weight regain after gastric bypass: safety and efficacy threshold occurs at <70% bypass.

Background: For patients with poor weight loss (WL) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) there are few well-tolerated and effective surgical options. Revision to distal bypass by shortening of the common channel (CC) induces significant WL but often produces protein calorie malnutrition (PCM) and severe diarrhea.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify a safe and effective threshold for distal small bowel bypass when done for revision of gastric bypass.

Setting: Academic Institution, United States.

Methods: We performed revision of RYGB for WL in 20 patients by shortening the CC to a new length of 120-300 cm. The Roux limb length was unchanged. WL and PCM were monitored. A threshold for percent of small bowel bypassed at which PCM was avoided was retrospectively determined. WL was then compared in patients above and below this threshold. Five patients completed a 250-kcal mixed meal challenge before and 3 months after revision to determine selected gut hormone responses.

Results: Bypassing ≥70% small bowel resulted in PCM in 4 of 10 patients but in none of 10 patients below that threshold. PCM was observed as late as 2 years after revision and necessitated rerevision by lengthening of the CC in 3 patients. Additionally, nocturnal diarrhea was more common and more intractable when ≥70% bypass was done. Both groups had significant excess body WL over 2 years, but it was greater in patients with ≥70% bypass (47±19 versus 26±17; P<.05). A favorable gut hormone response was observed with 3-hour decrease in glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) by 25% and increase in glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) by 25%, whereas fasting peptide-YY (PYY) increased by 71% (P<.05 for all).

Conclusions: Revision of RYGB to distal bypass when it is <70% of a patient's small bowel length results in an acceptable balance of WL and a positive safety profile. WL may be mediated through an enhanced gut hormone effect, an aversion to ingested fat, and possibly other mechanisms.