98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Local anaesthesia is commonly used in paediatric oral healthcare. Infiltration anaesthesia is the most frequently used, but recent developments in anaesthesia techniques have introduced an alternative: intraosseous anaesthesia. We propose to perform a split-mouth and parallel-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the pain caused by the insertion of the needle for the injection of conventional infiltration anaesthesia, and intraosseous anaesthesia by the computerised QuickSleeper system, in children and adolescents.
Methods And Analysis: Inclusion criteria are patients 7-15 years old with at least 2 first permanent molars belonging to the same dental arch (for the split-mouth RCT) or with a first permanent molar (for the parallel-arm RCT) requiring conservative or endodontic treatment limited to pulpotomy. The setting of this study is the Department of Paediatric Dentistry at 3 University dental hospitals in France. The primary outcome measure will be pain reported by the patient on a visual analogue scale concerning the insertion of the needle and the injection/infiltration. Secondary outcomes are latency, need for additional anaesthesia during the treatment and pain felt during the treatment. We will use a computer-generated permuted-block randomisation sequence for allocation to anaesthesia groups. The random sequences will be stratified by centre (and by dental arch for the parallel-arm RCT). Only participants will be blinded to group assignment. Data will be analysed by the intent-to-treat principle. In all, 160 patients will be included (30 in the split-mouth RCT, 130 in the parallel-arm RCT).
Ethics And Dissemination: This protocol has been approved by the French ethics committee for the protection of people (Comité de Protection des Personnes, Ile de France I) and will be conducted in full accordance with accepted ethical principles. Findings will be reported in scientific publications and at research conferences, and in project summary papers for participants.
Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02084433.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499744 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007724 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Emerg Med
October 2025
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Establishing vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is essential for delivering guideline-recommended medications. This meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of initial vascular access attempts through the intraosseous route to the intravenous route in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to March 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) observational studies comparing initial attempt intraosseous access with initial intravenous access in patients with OHCA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDent J (Basel)
July 2025
Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
: The main purpose of the present scoping review was to map and explore the efficacy of computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia (CCIA) in comparison with conventional dental anesthesia in pediatric dental patients. Secondarily, this study aimed to compare the acceptance and preference factors between CCIA and conventional dental anesthesia in children. Given the limited and heterogeneous nature of the available literature, this review aimed to identify gaps and scope the extent of research conducted in this area, providing a foundation for future, more targeted studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDent J (Basel)
May 2025
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada.
: Although many studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of intraosseous anesthesia (IOA), the experience of clinicians administering IOA has rarely been reported. Some endodontists may never have received formal training in IOA, raising questions about whether inexperienced clinicians can achieve similar results. Although the previous studies suggest that limited experience may increase the risk of complications, the extent to which clinician experience influences IOA outcomes remains uncertain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Arch Paediatr Dent
May 2025
Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.
Purpose: The aim of the present review was to critically evaluate recent studies to determine the optimal combination of anaesthetic technique and agent for achieving effective anaesthesia in molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) patients, thereby addressing a significant need in evidence-based clinical practice. The search question was: What is the most effective modality of anaesthesia to reduce hypersensitivity in MIH-affected teeth in children?
Methods: A systematic search was conducted using four databases, namely, MEDLINE via PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), using a selection of MeSH terms. The "Modified Jadad Scale" and the "Newcastle Ottawa Scale" were used for the methodology assessment of the included studies.
J Arthroplasty
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand.
Background: Effective postoperative pain management is important following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intraosseous regional administration (IORA) of antibiotics in TKA results in higher local tissue concentrations, potentially improving efficacy. We investigated using IORA diclofenac to improve postoperative pain management in TKA compared to intravenous (IV) diclofenac.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF