Primary non-adherence in Portugal: findings and implications.

Int J Clin Pharm

Instituto Superior de Ciências da Saúde Egas Moniz, Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz, Observatório Português dos Sistemas de Saúde, Campus Universitário, Quinta da Granja, Monte da Caparica, 2825-083, Caparica, Portugal,

Published: August 2015


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Portugal is currently facing a serious economic and financial crisis, which is dictating some important changes in the health care sector. Some of these measures may potentially influence patients' access to medication and consequently adherence, which will ultimately impact on health status, especially in chronic patients.

Aims: This study aimed at providing a snapshot of adherence in patients with chronic conditions in Portugal between March and April 2012.

Setting: Community pharmacy in Portugal.

Method: A cross-sectional pilot study was undertaken, where patients were recruited via community pharmacies to a questionnaire study evaluating the number of prescribed and purchased drugs and, when these figures were inconsistent, the reasons for this.

Main Outcome Measures: Primary and secondary adherence measures. Failing to purchase prescription items was categorized as primary nonadherence. Secondary nonadherence was attributed to purchasing prescription items, but not taking medicines as prescribed.

Results: Data were collected from 375 patients. Primary nonadherence was identified in 22.8 % of patients. Regardless of the underlying condition, the most commonly reported reason for primary non-adherence was having spare medicines at home ("leftovers"), followed by financial problems. The latter appeared to be related to the class of medicines prescribed. Primary non-adherence was associated with low income (<475 /month; p = 0.026). Secondary non-adherence, assessed by the 7-MMAS was detected in over 50 % of all patients, where unintentional nonadherence was higher than intentional nonadherence across all disease conditions.

Conclusion: This study revealed that more than one fifth of chronic medication users report primary nonadherence (22.8 %) and more than 50 % report secondary nonadherence. Data indicates that the existence of spare medicines and financial constraints occurred were the two most frequent reasons cited for nonadherence (47, 6-64, 8 and 19-45.5 %, depending on the major underlying condition, respectively).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0108-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary non-adherence
12
prescription items
8
primary nonadherence
8
primary
6
non-adherence portugal
4
portugal findings
4
findings implications
4
implications background
4
background portugal
4
portugal currently
4

Similar Publications

Background: 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are the primary treatment for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Maintenance therapy with 5-ASA has been shown to reduce both the risk of relapse and colorectal cancer.

Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of 5-ASA withdrawal due to non-adherence in UC patients while in remission on monotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prcis: This cross-sectional survey study evaluated the current treatment preferences of US glaucoma specialists for open-angle glaucoma, finding that most preferred selective laser trabeculoplasty over topical medications for treatment-naïve patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.

Purpose: To describe US glaucoma specialists' preferences regarding the use of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) versus topical glaucoma medications for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma.

Methods: Actively practicing glaucoma specialists from the American Glaucoma Society were invited to participate in a survey assessing treatment preferences and influencing factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Lifestyle modification plays a key role in prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but often fails due to non-adherence to lifestyle recommendations. Previous research has highlighted the importance of psychosocial factors in non-adherence, though focused on rather than prevention. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the moderating role of psychosocial factors on the effect of lifestyle interventions in primary CVD prevention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Determinants of Non-Adherence to Anti-Tuberculosis Treatment in a Public Primary Healthcare Clinic in South Africa: Improving the Quality of Long-Term Care.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

July 2025

Department of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Sissons Street, Fortgale, Mthatha 5117, Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Background: Non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment remains a major obstacle to increasing tuberculosis treatment success rates and enhancing healthcare expenditure. The aim of this study was to identify determinants contributing to non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment in a public primary healthcare clinic in South Africa.

Method: A cross-sectional study was carried out to collect data from 65 participants using face-to-face interviews with a structured questionnaire.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

While digital health interventions (DHIs) have become an increasingly common approach to address HIV vulnerability among young sexual and gender minority men who have sex with men (YSGMMSM), few studies consider the role of neighborhood disadvantage in DHI efficacy and engagement. The present study is a secondary data analysis of 212 YSGMMSM aged 16-24 that combined biological and clinical survey data from the primary efficacy randomized controlled trial (RCT) of P3, a PrEP adherence DHI, with a measure of neighborhood disadvantage to characterize P3 engagement and efficacy among high and low disadvantage neighborhoods. We found that participants residing in high disadvantage neighborhoods engaged with P3 a median of 63 days (IQR = 39-76), compared to 77 days (IQR = 51-82) in low disadvantage neighborhoods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF