Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

This satellite symposium was the fourth in a series for editors, publishers, reviewers and all those with an interest in scientific publishing. It was held on Wednesday 25th June 2014 at the IADR International meeting in Cape Town, South Africa. The symposium attracted more than 180 attendees. This symposium placed an emphasis on how the quality of papers submitted to dental journals could be improved. The panel included representation from editors, researchers and publishers from North America, India and the Gulf States. The symposium identified a number of challenges for editors and publishers, including the poor quality of many papers submitted to dental and other scientific journals, plagiarism, attempted duplicate publication and sometimes fraudulent results. Where possible speakers are identified by name. A subsequent symposium was held during the IADR meeting in Boston on March 11th 2015. Involvement open to editors, associate editors, publishers and others with an interest in scientific publishing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

editors publishers
16
quality papers
12
papers submitted
12
submitted dental
12
interest scientific
12
scientific publishing
12
dental journals
8
editors associate
8
associate editors
8
publishers interest
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To report the level of knowledge, impressions, and satisfaction of Urology readers, authors, and editorial boards regarding Open Access (OA) publishing in the field of Urology and to determine their satisfaction with the current OA models.

Methods: We developed an online, five-section cross-sectional survey including 23 questions. To recruit participants, we used mixed methods to obtain responses based on a simple random sampling and convenience sampling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Recommendations regarding the use of third-trimester ultrasound lack universal consensus. Yet, there is evidence which supports its value in assessing fetal growth, fetal well-being, and a number of pregnancy-related complications. This literature review evaluates the available scientific evidence regarding its applications, usefulness, and the timing of the third-trimester scan in a low-risk population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Based on extensive evidence, gender-affirming care (GAC) is endorsed by numerous medical societies as the gold standard for supporting youth who are transgender and gender diverse (TGD). Unfortunately, there remain barriers to accessing GAC and an ongoing risk of gender identity-based mistreatment for youth who are TGD accessing all forms of health care. Gynecologic care is commonly accessed by youth who are TGD as part of medical gender affirmation, with needs ranging from hormone management, menstrual suppression, contraception counseling, and surgical consultation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Studies comparing chronic constipation (CC) and asymptomatic subjects are lacking in our population. This study aimed to compare the high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) profiles of patients with CC and healthy volunteers (HV), as well as patients with functional defecation disorders (FDD) and those without in the constipation group.

Methods: This retrospective comparative study included patients with CC who underwent HRAM and a balloon expulsion test (BET).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF