98%
921
2 minutes
20
This research examined disadvantageous inequality aversion in 4- and 6-year-old children. Using the resource allocation paradigm, we explored how inequality aversion was influenced by whether a cost was associated with the equitable choice. We also investigated whether preferences for equality differed depending on whether the inequitable choice presented a small or large discrepancy between the payoff of the participant and their partner. The results demonstrated that cost plays a large role in decision-making, as children preferred equality more when there was no cost associated with it compared to when there was a cost. Interestingly, the effect of cost also affected discrepancy, with children more likely to choose equality when the discrepancy was large as opposed to small, in cost trials but not in no cost trials. Finally, the effect of discrepancy also interacted with age, with older children being more sensitive to the discrepancy between themselves and their partner. Together, these results suggest that children's behavior is not indiscriminately guided by a generalized aversion to inequality or established fairness norms. Alternate motives for inequality aversion are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176036 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01088 | DOI Listing |
Behav Sci (Basel)
July 2025
School of Education and Psychology, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610225, China.
Children are not only concerned about fairness but also care for others. This study examined how experimentally induced empathic concern influences children's responses to inequity, particularly when fairness considerations may conflict with empathy-driven motivations. A sample of 10- to 12-year-old children ( = 111, 62 boys, 49 girls) from China were randomly assigned to an empathic or non-empathic condition and completed multiple rounds of ultimatum and dictator games, acting as recipients and proposers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDev Sci
September 2025
University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
A key milestone in the development of fairness is disadvantageous inequity aversion: a willingness to sacrifice valuable rewards to avoid receiving less than a peer. The equal respect hypothesis suggests that, in addition to material concerns, children are also motivated to reject disadvantageous inequity due to interpersonal concerns. To test this prediction, we investigated how young children (N = 184, ages 4-7) respond to receiving less of the objects they explicitly do not desire across three pre-registered experiments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Infect Public Health
July 2025
Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Background: Communities hardest-hit by early SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks accrued more immunity, but prioritizing these communities for vaccination could reduce health disparities. Optimal vaccine allocation depends on inequality aversion, i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAge Ageing
August 2025
Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Background: Three pathways exist for community-based falls prevention: reactive (R), after a fall requiring medical attention; proactive (P), after professional referral of high-risk individuals; and self-referred (SR), voluntary intervention enrolment. The UK guidelines recommend scale-up of all three ['recommended care' (RC)], but scale-up of none ['usual care' (UC)], one (R, P, SR) or two (R+P, R+SR, P+SR) are potential options. This study aims to compare the options in terms of efficiency and equity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFValue Health
July 2025
Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital HF, Lørenskog, Norway. Electronic address:
Objectives: Health inequality aversion parameters can be used to inform health-related social welfare functions (HRSWFs) when trade-offs between maximising and equalising health arise in health policy. Empirical estimates of inequality aversion among the public can be valuable to ensure that approaches to the trade-off reflect public preferences. We aimed to elicit inequality aversion parameters in a large population sample across different health distributions to inform HRSWFs of the Atkinson and Kolm-Pollak type and compare responses from different distributions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF