A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Development of an optimal sampling schedule for children receiving ketamine for short-term procedural sedation and analgesia. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Intravenous racemic ketamine is commonly administered for procedural sedation, although few pharmacokinetic studies have been conducted among children. Moreover, an optimal sampling schedule has not been derived to enable the conduct of pharmacokinetic studies that minimally inconvenience study participants.

Methods: Concentration-time data were obtained from 57 children who received 1-1.5 mg·kg(-1) of racemic ketamine as an intravenous bolus. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using nonlinear mixed effects models, and the results were used as inputs to develop a D-optimal sampling schedule.

Results: The pharmacokinetics of ketamine were described using a two-compartment model. The volume of distribution in the central and peripheral compartments were 20.5 l∙70 kg(-1) and 220 l∙70 kg(-1), respectively. The intercompartmental clearance and total body clearance were 87.3 and 87.9 l·h(-1) ∙70 kg(-1), respectively. Population parameter variability ranged from 34% to 98%. Initially, blood samples were drawn on 3-6 occasions spanning a range of 14-152 min after dosing. Using these data, we determined that four optimal sampling windows occur at 1-5, 5.5-7.5, 10-20, and 90-180 min after dosing. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that these sampling windows produced precise and unbiased ketamine pharmacokinetic parameter estimates.

Conclusion: An optimal sampling schedule was developed that allowed assessment of the pharmacokinetic parameters of ketamine among children requiring short-term procedural sedation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.12521DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

optimal sampling
16
sampling schedule
12
procedural sedation
12
short-term procedural
8
racemic ketamine
8
pharmacokinetic studies
8
l∙70 kg-1
8
min dosing
8
sampling windows
8
sampling
6

Similar Publications