98%
921
2 minutes
20
Learning theories categorize learning systems into elemental and contextual systems, the former being processed by non-hippocampal regions and the latter being processed in the hippocampus. A set of complex stimuli such as a visual background is often considered a contextual stimulus and simple sensory stimuli such as pure tone and light are considered elemental stimuli. However, this elemental-contextual categorization scheme has only been tested in limited behavioral paradigms and it is largely unknown whether it can be generalized across different learning situations. By requiring rats to respond differently to a common object in association with various types of sensory cues including contextual and elemental stimuli, we tested whether different types of elemental and contextual sensory stimuli depended on the hippocampus to different degrees. In most rats, a surrounding visual background and a tactile stimulus served as contextual (hippocampal dependent) and elemental (non-hippocampal dependent) stimuli, respectively. However, simple tone and light stimuli frequently used as elemental cues in traditional experiments required the hippocampus to varying degrees among rats. Specifically, one group of rats showed a normal contextual bias when both contextual and elemental cues were present. These rats effectively switched to using elemental cues when the hippocampus was inactivated. The other group showed a strong contextual bias (and hippocampal dependence) because these rats were not able to use elemental cues when the hippocampus was unavailable. It is possible that the latter group of rats might have interpreted the elemental cues (light and tone) as background stimuli and depended more on the hippocampus in associating the cues with choice responses. Although exact mechanisms underlying these individual variances are unclear, our findings recommend a caution for adopting a simple sensory stimulus as a non-hippocampal sensory cue only based on the literature.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4058707 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00217 | DOI Listing |
Learn Behav
July 2025
Southampton University, Southampton, England.
Cue-exposure is a treatment (e.g. for addictions and phobias) that aims to extinguish conditioned responses to target cues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Oral Biol Craniofac Res
March 2025
Department of Oral Biology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Introduction: Alginate has garnered significant attention in regenerative dentistry for its biocompatibility, mechanical strength, and controlled biodegradability. The incorporation of hydroxyapatite enhances its ability to mimic the dentin extracellular matrix, promoting cellular adhesion, proliferation, and mineralization. This study aims to comprehensively assess the structural, chemical, and biological properties of Alg-HA scaffolds to evaluate their potential for dentin regeneration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomed Mater
September 2024
Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, CBIT, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
ISME J
January 2024
Institut de Ciències del Mar, ICM-CSIC, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Marine planktonic predator-prey interactions occur in microscale seascapes, where diffusing chemicals may act either as chemotactic cues that enhance or arrest predation, or as elemental resources that are complementary to prey ingestion. The phytoplankton osmolyte dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and its degradation products dimethylsulfide (DMS) and acrylate are pervasive compounds with high chemotactic potential, but there is a longstanding controversy over whether they act as grazing enhancers or deterrents. Here, we investigated the chemotactic responses of three herbivorous dinoflagellates to point-sourced, microscale gradients of dissolved DMSP, DMS, and acrylate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn
July 2024
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle.
Elemental models of associative learning typically employ a common prediction-error term. Following a conditioning trial, they predict that the change in the strength of an association between a cue and an outcome is dependent upon how well the outcome was predicted. When multiple cues are present, they each contribute to that prediction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF