98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: During carotid endarterectomy (CEA), hemodynamic stability and adequate fluid management are crucial to prevent perioperative cerebral stroke, myocardial infarction and hyperperfusion syndrome. Both pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), dynamic preload indices derived from the arterial waveform, are increasingly advocated as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of PPV and SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing CEA.
Methods: Twenty seven patients undergoing CEA were enrolled in this study. PPV, SVV and cardiac output (CO) were measured before and after fluid loading of 500 ml of hydroxyethyl starch solution. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CO ≥ 15%. The ability of PPV and SVV to predict fluid responsiveness was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Results: Both PPV and SVV measured before fluid loading are associated with changes in CO caused by fluid expansion. The ROC analysis showed that PPV and SVV predicted response to volume loading (area under the ROC curve = 0.854 and 0.841, respectively, P < 0.05). A PPV ≥ 9.5% identified responders (Rs) with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 90.9%, and a SVV ≥ 7.5% identified Rs with a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 63.6%.
Conclusions: Both PPV and SVV values before volume loading are associated with increased CO in response to volume expansion. Therefore, PPV and SVV are useful predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing CEA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790035 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.65.3.237 | DOI Listing |
J Chin Med Assoc
August 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Background: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) individualizes fluid administration to optimize oxygen delivery and tissue perfusion. Traditional static parameters, such as central venous and pulmonary artery wedge pressures, are inaccurate. Instead, GDFT employs dynamic variables like stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) to assess preload responsiveness and guide fluid administration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Monit Comput
May 2025
Department of Cardiothoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Anaesthesia Section, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
The effects of pneumoperitoneum on dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) remain uncertain. This uncertainty arises from potentially opposing physiological mechanisms that affect cardiovascular dynamics during conditions with increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Deriving PPV with high precision during induction of pneumoperitoneum may provide new insights into the complex relationship between intra-abdominal pressure changes and PPV.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Gen Med
April 2025
Division of Pulmonary and Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Purpose: Assessed the accuracy of stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) in predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) response in elderly patients with septic shock.
Patients And Methods: Mechanically ventilated patients aged over 65 with septic shock were enrolled. SVV, PPV, and Eadyn were recorded before and after FR testing (≥10% increase in cardiac output following a passive leg raise test or fluid challenge).
Crit Care Explor
May 2025
All authors: Intensive Care Unit, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.
Objectives: To analyze whether two levels of preload, one reduced by the application of tourniquets with sphygmomanometer cuffs and the other increased by passive leg elevation, improve the predictive capacity of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volume (Vt).
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: ICU at the University Hospital of Cádiz (Spain).
Shock
June 2025
Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Background: Dynamic assessment of cardiac output (CO) with passive leg raise (PLR), stroke volume variation (SVV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) offer effective and safe methods to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with shock. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of CO and SVV readings with the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) 1A device compared to PPV measurements in determining fluid responsiveness of patients in shock. Materials and Method: Intubated and mechanically ventilated patients aged 18-95 with shock admitted to the medical intensive care unit from June 2019 to December 2020 were included in the study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF