A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Combined use of WEPS and Models-3/CMAQ for simulating wind erosion source emission and its environmental impact. | LitMetric

Combined use of WEPS and Models-3/CMAQ for simulating wind erosion source emission and its environmental impact.

Sci Total Environ

Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; College of Urban and Environmental Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.

Published: January 2014


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The wind erosion source is the greatest contributor of PM₁₀ in Tianjin, China. It is difficult to establish a PM₁₀ emission inventory for the wind erosion source because of the complicated conditions affecting PM₁₀ emissions from wind erosion. In this study, a novel method is developed to establish a PM₁₀ emission inventory for the wind erosion source by using the Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS) model with 1 × 1 km spatial resolution. In 2011, the average annual emission of PM₁₀ in Tianjin was 0.373 tons km(-2) (1.113 tons km(-2) in the heating period, 0.237 tons km(-2) in the sand period, and 0.013 tons km(-2) in the non-heating period), and the total PM₁₀ emission was 904,871.6 tons (221,080.7 tons in the heating period, 52,977.8 tons in the sand period, and 1953.2 tons in the non-heating period). After establishing the PM₁₀ emission inventory for the wind erosion source in this manner, the data were input into Model-3/SMOKE. The contribution of the PM₁₀ concentration from the wind erosion source was estimated using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (Model-3/CMAQ) model and was compared with the monitoring value and the source apportionment results using the chemical mass balance (CMB) method. For this comparison, over the entire year, the R(2) was 0.711. More specifically, R(2) was 0.664, 0.733, and 0.679 in the heating, non-heating, and sand periods, respectively. Thus, we have obtained a reliable method for estimating the source of PM₁₀ from wind erosion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.090DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wind erosion
36
erosion source
24
pm₁₀ emission
16
tons km-2
16
emission inventory
12
inventory wind
12
wind
9
erosion
9
pm₁₀
9
source
8

Similar Publications