Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To define thresholds for detecting significant change in liver viscoelasticity with magnetic resonance (MR) elastography, both for whole-liver measurements and for voxel-wise measurements in relation to spatial resolution.
Materials And Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants provided written informed consent. Thirty participants (16 volunteers and 14 patients with hepatitis B or C; 18 men; median age, 30.4 years; age range, 18.9-58.6 years) underwent imaging twice while in the same position (intraimage reproducibility), after repositioning (within-day reproducibility), and 1-4 weeks later (between-weeks reproducibility). MR elastography parameters comprised elasticity, viscosity, attenuation parameter α, and propagation parameter β. Bland-Altman analysis was used to calculate repeatability indexes for each parameter. Analyses were performed in a region-of-interest and a voxel-by-voxel level. Voxel-wise results were calculated in relation to spatial resolution by applying Gaussian filtering to establish the optimal trade-off point between resolution and reproducibility.
Results: For elasticity, α, and β, within-day and between-weeks results were significantly lower than intraimage results (P ≤ .018 for all). Within-day and between-weeks results did not differ significantly. Over-time changes of more than 22.2% for elasticity, 26.3% for viscosity, 26.8% for α, and 10.1% for β represented thresholds for significant change. The optimal trade-off between spatial resolution and reproducibility was found at a filter size of 8-mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) for elasticity and propagation parameter β and at 16-mm FWHM for viscosity and attenuation parameter α.
Conclusion: Repositioning causes a significant decrease in the reproducibility of MR elastography. The propagation parameter β is the most reliable parameter, with an over-time threshold for significant change of 10.1% and the ability to reproduce viscoelasticity up to a resolution of 8-mm FWHM. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122669 | DOI Listing |