A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

MR elastography of the liver: defining thresholds for detecting viscoelastic changes. | LitMetric

MR elastography of the liver: defining thresholds for detecting viscoelastic changes.

Radiology

From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.B., P.F.C.G., J.S., A.J.N.) and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.D.N.), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and INSERM Department of Radiology, University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, IN

Published: December 2013


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To define thresholds for detecting significant change in liver viscoelasticity with magnetic resonance (MR) elastography, both for whole-liver measurements and for voxel-wise measurements in relation to spatial resolution.

Materials And Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants provided written informed consent. Thirty participants (16 volunteers and 14 patients with hepatitis B or C; 18 men; median age, 30.4 years; age range, 18.9-58.6 years) underwent imaging twice while in the same position (intraimage reproducibility), after repositioning (within-day reproducibility), and 1-4 weeks later (between-weeks reproducibility). MR elastography parameters comprised elasticity, viscosity, attenuation parameter α, and propagation parameter β. Bland-Altman analysis was used to calculate repeatability indexes for each parameter. Analyses were performed in a region-of-interest and a voxel-by-voxel level. Voxel-wise results were calculated in relation to spatial resolution by applying Gaussian filtering to establish the optimal trade-off point between resolution and reproducibility.

Results: For elasticity, α, and β, within-day and between-weeks results were significantly lower than intraimage results (P ≤ .018 for all). Within-day and between-weeks results did not differ significantly. Over-time changes of more than 22.2% for elasticity, 26.3% for viscosity, 26.8% for α, and 10.1% for β represented thresholds for significant change. The optimal trade-off between spatial resolution and reproducibility was found at a filter size of 8-mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) for elasticity and propagation parameter β and at 16-mm FWHM for viscosity and attenuation parameter α.

Conclusion: Repositioning causes a significant decrease in the reproducibility of MR elastography. The propagation parameter β is the most reliable parameter, with an over-time threshold for significant change of 10.1% and the ability to reproduce viscoelasticity up to a resolution of 8-mm FWHM. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122669DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

propagation parameter
12
thresholds detecting
8
relation spatial
8
reproducibility elastography
8
viscosity attenuation
8
attenuation parameter
8
spatial resolution
8
optimal trade-off
8
within-day between-weeks
8
parameter
7

Similar Publications