A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

CT number-controlling system for reproducibility of intracoronary CT number on follow-up coronary CT angiography. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may be useful for noninvasive follow-up; however, evaluation of coronary stenosis and CT number of plaque may be inaccurate under different vessel enhancement of contrast media. We examined the reproducibility of the CT number of repeat CCTA using our original CT number-controlling system (CTN-CS), which selects contrast level by a multiple regression equation using body surface area and peak CT number and peak time on timing bolus and during CCTA.

Methods And Results: One hundred seventy-two patients who underwent serial CCTA were prospectively and randomly assigned to 3 groups. In the first group, Group A, the amount of contrast for the second CCTA was determined by CTN-CS to match the intracoronary CT number of the first CCTA. In Group B, each patient received the same amount of intravenous contrast in both CCTA examinations. In Group C, 0.7 mL/mg body weight (BW) of contrast medium (350 mgI/mL) was used for baseline and follow-up CCTAs. The regression of repeated CCTAs was the best in Group A (r=0.85, p<0.001) vs. Group B (r=0.52, p<0.001), and Group C (r=0.61, p<0.001). The absolute difference between intracoronary CT numbers of the second and first CCTA was the lowest in Group A (24.8 ± 21.8HU), followed by Group B (37.6 ± 26.2 HU; p<0.05) and Group C (46.5 ± 34.4HU; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Using CTN-CS, the difference of intracoronary CT numbers of the second and first CCTA was the smallest when compared to CCTAs using the same contrast volumes or constant volumes per body weight.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.03.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

number-controlling system
8
intracoronary number
8
ccta
6
number
5
contrast
5
group
5
system reproducibility
4
reproducibility intracoronary
4
number follow-up
4
follow-up coronary
4

Similar Publications