Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Studies that draw on individual and environmental variables to explain differences in self-rated health status have increased gradually in Brazil, but are still limited in number. Due to time and cost issues, many studies use a complex sample design involving features (stratification, clustering, and different sample weights) that, when ignored, can influence odds ratios and standard errors in the statistical models. Using the National Household Sample Survey (PNAD 2008), this paper assesses the impact on these measurements when some or all of these features are not taken into account in fitting ordinal logistic models to establish associations between adults' self-rated health and various individual and environmental factors. According to this study, failure to take these three features into account simultaneously led to changes in the magnitude of the odds ratio between better self-rated health and most of the factors, besides important underestimation of standard errors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2012000500010 | DOI Listing |