Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the prognostic performance of a 15 gene expression profiling (GEP) assay that assigns primary posterior uveal melanomas to prognostic subgroups: class 1 (low metastatic risk) and class 2 (high metastatic risk).
Design: Prospective, multicenter study.
Participants: A total of 459 patients with posterior uveal melanoma were enrolled from 12 independent centers.
Testing: Tumors were classified by GEP as class 1 or class 2. The first 260 samples were also analyzed for chromosome 3 status using a single nucleotide polymorphism assay. Net reclassification improvement analysis was performed to compare the prognostic accuracy of GEP with the 7th edition clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification and chromosome 3 status.
Main Outcome Measures: Patients were managed for their primary tumor and monitored for metastasis.
Results: The GEP assay successfully classified 446 of 459 cases (97.2%). The GEP was class 1 in 276 cases (61.9%) and class 2 in 170 cases (38.1%). Median follow-up was 17.4 months (mean, 18.0 months). Metastasis was detected in 3 class 1 cases (1.1%) and 44 class 2 cases (25.9%) (log-rank test, P<10(-14)). Although there was an association between GEP class 2 and monosomy 3 (Fisher exact test, P<0.0001), 54 of 260 tumors (20.8%) were discordant for GEP and chromosome 3 status, among which GEP demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy (log-rank test, P = 0.0001). By using multivariate Cox modeling, GEP class had a stronger independent association with metastasis than any other prognostic factor (P<0.0001). Chromosome 3 status did not contribute additional prognostic information that was independent of GEP (P = 0.2). At 3 years follow-up, the net reclassification improvement of GEP over TNM classification was 0.43 (P = 0.001) and 0.38 (P = 0.004) over chromosome 3 status.
Conclusions: The GEP assay had a high technical success rate and was the most accurate prognostic marker among all of the factors analyzed. The GEP provided a highly significant improvement in prognostic accuracy over clinical TNM classification and chromosome 3 status. Chromosome 3 status did not provide prognostic information that was independent of GEP.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404209 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.017 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Choroidal Metastasis Presenting As Anterior and Posterior Scleritis: A Rare Manifestation of a Previously Unknown Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma.
Cureus
August 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, CAN.
Choroidal metastasis from occult cutaneous melanoma is rare and can masquerade as ocular inflammation. A 70‑year‑old man with sectoral anterior scleritis was found on multimodal imaging to have a solitary choroidal mass with mild periscleral fluid, prompting systemic evaluation that uncovered colonic polyps that, on histopathology, contained metastatic melanoma, a scalp primary, and widespread visceral, nodal, and intracranial metastases. Tumour cells stained HMB‑45, Melan‑A, and SOX10 positive, AE1/AE3 negative, and carried an NRAS‑Q61 mutation with wild‑type BRAF, confirming cutaneous origin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArtificial intelligence-assisted assessment of metabolic response to tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma: a long axial field-of-view [F]FDG PET/CT study.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
September 2025
Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Purpose: Tebentafusp has emerged as the first systemic therapy to significantly prolong survival in treatment-naïve HLA-A*02:01 + patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Notably, a survival benefit has been observed even in the absence of radiographic response. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and prognostic value of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted quantification and metabolic response assessment of [F]FDG long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT in mUM patients undergoing tebentafusp therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRare melanoma subtypes, including acral, mucosal, and uveal melanomas, exhibit limited responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), yet the molecular mechanisms of immune resistance remain poorly defined. Here, we performed transcriptomic profiling of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and publicly available tumor datasets to systematically compare intratumoral gene expression across cutaneous and rare melanoma subtypes. We identified a convergent downregulation of innate immune pathogen sensing (IIPS) and type I interferon signaling pathways in rare melanomas compared to cutaneous, with lower expression also observed in anti-PD-1 non-responder tumors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMelphalan Followed by Brachytherapy for Uveal Melanoma.
Ophthalmol Retina
September 2025
Ophthalmology Division, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fundus Depigmentation after Immunotherapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.
Ophthalmol Retina
September 2025
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; University of Iowa, Institute for Vision Research, Iowa City, Iowa.