Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Study Objectives: Approximately 30% of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients have supine-predominant OSA, and simply avoiding supine sleep should normalise respiratory disturbance event rates. However, traditional supine-avoidance therapies are inherently uncomfortable, and treatment adherence is poor and difficult to monitor objectively. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel, potentially more acceptable position monitor and supine-avoidance device for managing supine-predominant OSA and snoring.

Design And Setting: In-laboratory evaluation of position recording accuracy versus video recordings (validation study), and randomized controlled crossover trial of active versus inactive supine-avoidance therapy in the home setting (efficacy study).

Patients: 17 patients undergoing in-laboratory sleep studies (validation) and 15 patients with supine-predominant OSA (efficacy).

Interventions: EFFICACY STUDY: 1 week of inactive and 1 week of active treatment in randomized order, separated by 1 week.

Measurements And Results: Agreement between 30-sec epoch-based posture classifications from device versus video records was high (median κ 0.95, interquartile range: 0.88-1.00), and there was good supine time agreement (bias 0.3%, 95%CI: -4.0% to 4.6%). In the efficacy study, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and snoring frequency were measured in-home using a nasal pressure and microphone based system during inactive and active treatment weeks. The position monitoring and supine alarm device markedly inhibited supine time (mean ± SEM 19.3% ± 4.3% to 0.4% ± 0.3%, p < 0.001) and reduced AHI (25.0 ± 1.7 to 13.7 ± 1.1 events/h, p = 0.030) but not snoring frequency.

Conclusions: This new position monitoring and supine alarm device records sleep position accurately and improves OSA but not snoring in patients with supine-predominant OSA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161770PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/JCSM.1194DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

supine-predominant osa
16
position monitoring
12
patients supine-predominant
12
obstructive sleep
8
sleep apnea
8
position recording
8
versus video
8
efficacy study
8
active treatment
8
supine time
8

Similar Publications

A Comparison of Snoring Changes With a Supine-Avoidance Alarm Device Compared to Constant Positive Airway Pressure Treatment in Patients With Supine-Predominant OSA.

J Sleep Res

June 2025

Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute: Sleep Health, (Formerly Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.

This study aimed to quantify how much snoring occurs in patients with supine-predominant OSA and the comparative effectiveness of supine-avoidance therapy versus CPAP to reduce objective measures of snoring. Participants had a 1-week in-home sleep posture assessment and a in-home PSG study before being randomised to either CPAP or supine-avoidance therapy for 6-8 weeks, then switched treatments for another 6-8 weeks. Snoring and treatment outcomes were examined in a subgroup of patients with supine dependent snoring.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by recurrent upper airway obstructions during sleep. Positional OSA (POSA) and non-positional OSA are major subgroups that differ in clinical, polysomnographic, and treatment aspects. Furthermore, POSA can be classified into supine-isolated POSA (siPOSA) and supine-predominant POSA (spPOSA), which exhibit distinct characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Community prevalence of positional obstructive sleep apnea.

J Clin Sleep Med

May 2025

Sleep Disorders Centre, Department of Respiratory & Sleep Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.

Study Objectives: The prevalence of positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) in community populations warrants further investigation. Further, more research is needed into the clinical characteristics of its subtypes such as supine predominant OSA (spOSA) and supine isolated OSA (siOSA).

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on 1,870 Sleep Heart Health Study participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) in reducing the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) compared to a control group of nonpositional OSA (NPOSA) patients.
  • It analyzed records from 39 adult POSA patients and 47 NPOSA patients, looking at various factors such as demographics, sleep test results, and dental evaluations before and after treatment with MADs.
  • Results showed that MADs significantly reduced AHI in both groups, with the most notable improvements in patients with positional apnea, and a significant decrease in the snore index for NPOSA patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Over half of all cases of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are classified as supine-related OSA; however, the pathological endotype during supine position is not fully understood. This study aims to investigate the endotypic traits of supine-predominant OSA and explore the variations in endotypic traits between the supine and lateral positions.

Methods: We prospectively recruited 689 adult patients with OSA from a single sleep centre between April 2020 and December 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF