98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Among the procedure-related factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis, selective cannulation of the common bile duct by insertion of a guidewire may be associated with fewer complications than conventional methods of cannulation with contrast injection to access the bile duct. However, the results of studies regarding the usefulness of wire-guided cannulation (WGC) are conflicting.
Objective: This prospective randomized trial was designed to determine whether WGC reduces the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Design: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center.
Patients: A total of 300 consecutive patients with native papilla and pancreaticobiliary disease who were candidates for therapeutic ERCP were randomized from June 2006 to May 2007.
Interventions: WGC without contrast injection or conventional cannulation with contrast injection.
Main Outcome Measurements: Post-ERCP pancreatitis, risk factors, and procedure-related complications were evaluated prospectively.
Results: A total of 3 patients (2%) in the WGC group and 17 patients (11.3%) in the conventional group had post-ERCP pancreatitis (P = .001). Among the cases of acute pancreatitis in the WGC group, 2 patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) and unintentional main pancreatic duct (PD) guidewire cannulation showed post-ERCP pancreatitis despite the use of WGC. In multivariate analysis, WGC was a protective factor (odds ratio 0.1; 95% CI, 0.024-0.490, P = .004), whereas female sex and SOD were risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Limitation: Our study population was a low-risk cohort.
Conclusions: WGC is associated with a lower rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, WGC may not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected SOD and unintentional PD guidewire cannulation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.064 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
August 2025
Liver Cancer Department, Binh Dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh, VNM.
Duodenal perforation is a rare but harmful complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Early diagnosis and appropriate management are critical to reduce morbidity and mortality. Four patients, aged 36 to 56 years, underwent ERCP for biliary obstruction due to choledocholithiasis or postoperative biliary stricture.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Acute pancreatitis is a significant complication of endoscopic retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with no established prevention strategy. Recent studies suggest that rectal indomethacin may reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), but its effectiveness varies with patient risk levels and the concurrent use of pancreatic stenting. This updated meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of rectal indomethacin in preventing PEP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Endosc
September 2025
Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Objective: To evaluate the application effects of different balloon dilation durations in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) and small endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation (ESBD) for biliary duct calculi by network meta-analysis and find the most appropriate dilation durations for both.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and other databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 2024. Data were analyzed using R (V.
Clin Endosc
August 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
Background/aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is conventionally performed in the prone position (PP). Recent studies have shown that the supine position (SP) is an effective alternative, with comparable success rates. We conducted a meta-analysis to directly compare the safety and efficacy of the two ERCP positions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTherap Adv Gastroenterol
August 2025
Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Second Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510080, China.
Background: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has been recommended as a potential alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones (CBDS), due to protecting the sphincter function.
Objectives: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) versus endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) after EPBD for CBDS.
Design: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients with CBDS who underwent EPBD followed by either ENBD or ERBD.