Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
We report the case of a 46-year-old female who showed excellent clinical outcomes after palliative 3rd line capecitabine monotherapy followed by 2nd liver metastasectomy. She had been diagnosed with colon cancer with liver metastasis and initially treated with synchronous colectomy and liver metastasectomy. But she experienced immediate relapse in liver and received palliative 1st line FOLFIRI and 2nd line FOLFOX, both of which failed to show responses. Capecitabine alone as palliative 3rd line treatment did show clinical response in this patient, indeed, and she received 2nd liver metastasectomy which revealed pathologic complete response. In this report, we intended to emphasize that response to chemotherapy could be an important factor in patients who are potential candidates for metastasectomy and that catching the very moment of repeated metastasectomy is in the state of the art.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-008-0766-y | DOI Listing |