Severity: Warning
Message: opendir(/var/lib/php/sessions): Failed to open directory: Permission denied
Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php
Line Number: 365
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: This study evaluated the accuracy of 2 implant-level impression techniques (direct nonsplinted and splinted) for the fabrication of multi-unit internal-connection implant restorations in 2 simulated clinical settings (parallel and divergent) using a laboratory model.
Materials And Methods: A dental stone master model was fabricated with 2 pairs of implant replicas. One pair simulated a parallel clinical condition and the other an 8-degree-divergent condition. Ten stone casts were made from vinyl polysiloxane impressions of the master model for each impression technique. Half of the samples were created by a direct nonsplinted technique (square impression copings, custom tray), and the other half were made by a direct splinted technique (square impression copings splinted with autopolymerizing acrylic resin, custom tray). Four strain gauges were fixed on each metal framework to measure the degree of framework deformation for each stone cast in half-Wheatstone-bridge formations. Deformation readings were made twice in 4 directions (anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior). Deformation data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance at a .05 level of significance.
Results: No significant difference in deformation was found between the direct nonsplinted and splinted samples in either simulated clinical condition (P > .05). No significant difference in deformation was found between the techniques regardless of condition (P > .05).
Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, using a 2-implant model, the accuracy of implant-level impressions for internal-connection implant restorations was similar for the direct nonsplinted and splinted techniques in settings with divergence up to 8 degrees.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res
February 2025
Department of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India.
Background: Splinting is commonly employed to stabilize periodontally compromised teeth, but the choice of splint material significantly influences stress distribution within the periodontal ligament (PDL) and surrounding bone. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stress distribution of four different splint materials-composite, fiber-reinforced composite (FRC), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and metal-on mandibular anterior teeth with 55 % bone loss using finite element analysis (FEA).
Methodology: Finite element models of mandibular anterior teeth with 55 % bone loss were developed using SOLIDWORKS 2020.
PLoS One
March 2024
Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of narrow-diameter implant (NDI) treatment in atrophic maxillary posterior teeth in aging patients by finite element analysis. The upper left posterior bone segment with first and second premolar teeth missing obtained from a patient's cone beam computed tomography data was simulated with cortical bone thicknesses of 0.5 and 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pharm Bioallied Sci
July 2023
Associate Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Clinical Practitioner, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Background: The current study examined the accuracy of casts generated using direct impression processes with and without splints for multiple dental implants utilizing two different splinting materials and impression materials.
Materials And Methods: Dental replacement base intensity alleviating acrylic tar was used to create a reference model of a mandible with four inserts (Uniti, Equinox, D-3.7 mm, and L-13 mm) in the front.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc
December 2022
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Aim: To compare marginal bone loss (MBL), implant survival rate and prosthetic complications of implant-supported splinted and non-splinted restorations (NSR).
Settings And Design: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). The PROSPERO registry, which keeps track of prospective systematic reviews, also received this paper (CRD42021229477).
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
August 2022
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of splinting impression copings on the accuracy of conventional impressions for two-unit nonparallel implant restorations.
Materials And Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched with no publication year or language limits, and studies comparing the accuracy of conventional impressions for two-unit nonparallel implant restorations made using splinted impression copings and nonsplinted impression copings were identified. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software.