Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To study the cardiorespiratory effects of inspiratory flow rate and waveform in COPD patients.
Design: Prospective physiological investigation with randomized allocations of experimental conditions.
Setting: A 14-bed medical ICU in a 1000-bed university hospital.
Patients And Participants: Ten COPD intubated, sedated and paralyzed patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure.
Interventions: In volume-controlled mode, three inflation flow rates of 0.40, 0.70, and 1.10 l/s for 20 min with a constant (CF) or a decelerating (DF) inflation flow profile. Each patient received all six experimental conditions in a random order. Tidal volume and respiratory frequency were similar during the experimental conditions.
Measurements And Results: Arterial blood gases, hemodynamics ( n=8), and respiratory mechanics were measured with zero end expiratory pressure. Between flow rates the median (25th-75th percentiles) values of PaO(2)/FIO(2) were 232 (132-289), 253 (161-338), 231 (163-352) for CF and 253 (143-331), 249 (164-360), 231 mmHg (187-351), for DF, respectively; the maximal airway pressures were 25.6, 28.3, 34.6 cmH(2)O for CF and 21.7, 29.6, 34.8 cmH(2)O for DF, respectively, the mean airway pressures were 8.9, 6.1, 5.4 cmH(2)O for CF and 9.1, 7, 6.5 cmH(2)O for DF, respectively.
Conclusions: Changing the ventilator in volume-controlled mode with a DF or CF profile has no significant cardiorespiratory effect in intubated COPD patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1163-8 | DOI Listing |