Minimally Invasive Liver Transplantation: The Recipient Operation.

The introduction of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH) operation saw the initiation and incorporation of minimal access surgery into the field of liver transplantation (LT). Several studies, meta-analyses, and consensus guidelines have demonstrated the undisputed advantages of the MIDH operation. Given these positive trends, and the increasing acceptance and acknowledgment of the safety of MIDH among the transplant community, there has been an intuitive thrust to further push the boundaries of what was initially considered unfeasible - to that of the minimally invasive liver transplant recipient surgery (MIRS).

Current Status and Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Pediatric Acute Liver Failure: Results From a Multicenter Retrospective Study Over Two Decades.

Background: Although the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) have improved, patient survival remains lower than in patients with chronic liver disease. We investigated whether the poor outcomes of LDLT for PALF persisted in the contemporary transplant era.

Methods: We analyzed 193 patients who underwent LDLT between December 2000 and December 2020.

Effect of donor warm ischemia time during graft extraction in right lobe robotic donor hepatectomy on recipient outcomes-A propensity score matched analysis.

One of the concerns specific to minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH) is the prolonged time required for graft extraction after completion of the donor hepatectomy (donor warm ischemia time [DWIT]). There has never been an objective evaluation of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy-DWIT on allograft function in living donor liver transplantation. We evaluated the effect of DWIT following robotic donor hepatectomy (RDH) on recipient outcomes and compared them with a matched cohort of open donor hepatectomy (ODH).

Experience With Establishing a Robotic Donor Hepatectomy Program for Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

Background: The benefits of minimal invasive donor hepatectomy, especially for left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) have been unequivocally demonstrated. Moreover, donors in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) are usually parents who need to recover quickly to take care of the child. There are inherent limitations to conventional laparoscopic surgery including surgeon's experience with advanced laparoscopic surgery and steep learning curve which limits the wide application of minimal invasive donor hepatectomy.

Technique of Hepatic Artery Anastomosis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Review of Its Results in Over 1200 Adult and Pediatric Transplants.

Background: Failure to achieve a good arterial inflow to the graft in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has disastrous consequences to the graft and patient survival. Standard microvascular techniques of hepatic artery (HA) anastomosis used in deceased donor liver transplantation are not applicable in LDLT. We present the results of our unique Backwall-first technique of HA anastomosis in both adult and pediatric LDLT.

Robotic monosegment donor hepatectomy for pediatric liver transplantation: First report.

Background: LT for infants less than 5 kg remains a challenge with high technical complication rates, which is further compounded by large-for-size grafts requiring hyper-reduction. The benefits of MIDH especially for standard left lateral segment (LLS) resection have been unequivocally demonstrated. However, given the fine margins of error, the highly challenging technical aspects of anatomical graft reduction test the limits of safety and may not be routinely feasible with the conventional laparoscopic approach.

Right hepatic arterial girdle around the common hepatic duct in liver donors: technical considerations for successful living donor liver transplantation.

Purpose: Variations in hepatic arterial anatomy can result in multiple arterial trunks in the graft liver. We describe our experience in dealing with five right lobe liver donors where in the right hepatic artery (RHA) branches were passing anterior and posterior to the common hepatic duct (CHD) forming an arterial girdle around it.

Methods: Five of 771 right lobe living donor liver transplants (January 2012 and March 2020) demonstrated the RHA girdle around the CHD.

Anatomical Basis for Selective Multiple Arterial Reconstructions in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Background: Need for routine reconstruction of all arteries in grafts with multiple arterial inflows remains an unsettled debate. The aim of following article is to review an anatomical basis of a decision-making strategy to deal with multiple arteries in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods: LDLT performed between August 2009-2019 were included.

Uncommon presentation of a recurrent diaphragmatic hernia after pediatric liver transplantation.

DH is a rare but well-recognized complication of PLT. However, a recurrent DH in the setting of PLT has not been reported. We report the case of a child who had previously undergone a DH repair early after PLT and presented more than two years later with atypical findings of severe sepsis and a tender abdominal swelling.

Feasibility and Safety of Split-Liver Transplantation in a Nascent Framework of Deceased Donation.

Split-liver transplantation (SLT) is a valuable option for optimizing the use of good-quality deceased donor grafts. It is not routinely reported outside the West because of limited deceased donor numbers, technical and organizational constraints, lack of experience, and a predominant living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) practice. At our center, 20% of the liver transplantations (LTs) are from deceased donors.

Vein resection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas adherent to the portomesenteric venous axis is beneficial despite a high rate of R1 resection.

Backgrounds/aims: En-bloc vein resection (VR) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the head of pancreas adherent to the portomesenteric axis benefits patients when the vein wall is not infiltrated by tumour and an R0 resection is achieved, albeit at the expense of greater morbidity and mortality.

Methods: A retrospective review of pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC over 6 years was conducted. Patients were divided into a standard resection group (Group SR) and simultaneous vein resection group (Group VR) and compared for outcome.