This column is the third in a 3-part series describing cases in which general medical knowledge, including psychiatric and clinical pharmacology, was instrumental in determining whether dereliction was the direct cause of damages in a malpractice suit. This case illustrates how not taking into account the following variables can result in a false-positive diagnosis of a lethal serotonin syndrome: (a) the time course of treatment, (b) the time course of symptoms, (c) the difference between antemortem plasma and postmortem whole-blood levels of highly protein bound and highly lipophilic drugs. The case also illustrates how taking those 3 variables into account led to the conclusion that there was no dereliction in the care of the patient that was the direct cause of his death, and hence, there was no medical malpractice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis column is the first of a 3-part series illustrating the importance of medical knowledge, including clinical pharmacology, in a forensic context. This first case involved an 18-year-old high school student who suffered an anoxic brain injury and remained in a state of permanent decorticate posture, unresponsive except for grunts and primitive movements until he died several years later. Our investigation began by ruling out plausible causes that were suggested by the defense in the malpractice suit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF