Publications by authors named "Adethen Gunasekaran"

Background: Propofol is one of the most used intravenous anesthetic agents in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients undergoing emergency neurosurgical procedures. Despite being efficacious, its administration is associated with dose-related adverse effects. The use of adjuvants along with propofol aids in limiting its consumption, thereby mitigating the side effects related to propofol usage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) can indicate elevated intracranial pressure and may be related to ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt function, particularly in adults with hydrocephalus, though research is limited.
  • This study involved 51 patients aged 16 to 60 scheduled for VP shunt surgery, measuring ONSD at various time points and assessing shunt success through noncontrast CT scans.
  • Results showed a significant decrease in ONSD post-surgery, suggesting that ONSD measurements could be a reliable indicator of successful VP shunt placement in these patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives The study was designed to elucidate the effects of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct to propofol in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on anesthetic dose reduction, the quality of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) recordings, analgesic requirements, and recovery parameters in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures with neurophysiological monitoring. Methods A total of 54 patients for elective neurosurgical procedures with IONM were randomized to group D (dexmedetomidine) and group F (fentanyl). A loading dose of the study drug of 1µg/kg followed by 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study compares two second-generation supraglottic airway devices, Ambu AuraGain and LMA ProSeal, focusing on their effectiveness in reducing gastric insufflation volume during general anesthesia in 120 adult patients.
  • Results showed that the Ambu AuraGain group had a significantly lower gastric volume at the end of surgery compared to the LMA ProSeal group (5.91 ml vs. 12.28 ml), along with differences observed within each group.
  • Additionally, while oropharyngeal sealing and peak airway pressures were similar between the two devices, the LMA ProSeal was associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF