A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Quantifying Malabsorption After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are common bariatric procedures that lead to substantial and sustained weight loss. Although both procedures induce hormonal and physiological effects, RYGB includes both a restrictive and malabsorptive component due to anatomical rerouting, whereas SG is considered primarily restrictive. This study aimed to quantify differences in energy and fat absorption between both procedures using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

Methods: Female patients, 12-24 months post-RYGB or SG, followed a strictly controlled, tailor-made diet for 6 days. Faecal samples collected over the final 3 days were analysed using NIRS to assess energy and fat malabsorption. Physical activity and stool consistency were also evaluated.

Results: Twenty-nine patients were initially included; one RYGB patient was excluded due to implausibly high reported energy intake leaving 14 RYGB and 14 SG patients. We found higher (p = 0.03) malabsorption in patients after RYGB (194.8 malabsorbed kcal, 13.2%) as compared to patients after SG (111.7 malabsorbed kcal, 7.6%). Furthermore, in the RYGB group, malabsorbed fat was higher (p = 0.01) with 9.7 g (15.4%) malabsorbed as compared to 3.9 g (6.1%) malabsorbed in SG. Even when adjusting for percentage weight loss, both differences remained statistically significant.

Conclusion: Fat and energy malabsorption are significantly higher following RYGB compared to SG, and NIRS proves to be a feasible method for assessing these differences. However, the differences are relatively modest and do not appear to be directly proportional to the reduction in functional intestinal length exposed to nutrients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08244-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

roux-en-y gastric
8
gastric bypass
8
sleeve gastrectomy
8
weight loss
8
energy fat
8
malabsorbed kcal
8
rygb
7
patients
5
malabsorbed
5
quantifying malabsorption
4

Similar Publications