A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Femtosecond-Laser-Assisted Liquid-Interface vs Vacuum-Trephine Keratoplasty: A Comparison of 2 Different Techniques - Retrospective Data Analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare postoperative astigmatism and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK) using a liquid-interface femtosecond laser (LI-fs) trephination and a conventional vacuum-trephine (VT) technique.

Methods: Our single-center, retrospective data analysis included 121 eyes (121 patients) treated between April 2014 and November 2022. Patients received PK either with a LI-fs or a VT system. Pre- and postoperative topography (K-values), refraction (cylinder) and visual acuity (VA) were measured up to 18 months after surgery. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, ANCOVA, and paired t-tests within each group.

Results: Preoperative and postoperative astigmatism were similar between the two techniques (LI-fs: 5.4 ± 3.4 D pre-OP vs 6.7 ± 4.2 D post-OP; VT group: 5.8 ± 4.8 D vs 6.7 ± 3.8D). An ANCOVA adjusting for baseline astigmatism (=∆K in topography imaging) revealed no statistically significant difference between groups (estimate [95% CI]: -0.79 [-2.73; 1.15], p = 0.42). Within-group changes in astigmatism were also not significant. For VA, a paired -test showed a significant increase of post-OP VA in the VT group (mean change 0.25 [0.15; 0.34], p < 0.0001), while the smaller LI-fs group showed no significant change (mean 0.16 [-0.11; 0.44], p = 0.22).

Conclusion: Despite the characteristics of LI-fs in maintaining corneal curvature, LI-fs and conventional VT generated comparable outcomes in terms of post-OP astigmatism. The results underscore the need for further research with larger cohorts to clarify any potential advantages of the LI-fs in reducing surgically-induced astigmatism.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416396PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S542124DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retrospective data
8
data analysis
8
postoperative astigmatism
8
visual acuity
8
post-op group
8
group change
8
li-fs
7
astigmatism
6
femtosecond-laser-assisted liquid-interface
4
liquid-interface vacuum-trephine
4

Similar Publications