98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Degeneration of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves is increasingly common. Redo surgical aortic valve replacement carries substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly or high-risk patients. Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an established alternative, though data on the performance of self-expanding Portico and Navitor valves remain limited.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 47 consecutive patients who underwent ViV TAVI for severe bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction between January 2020 and June 2024 at Barts Heart Center. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were evaluated using Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria.
Results: The median age was 79 years, and 80.9% had small surgical valves (≤ 23 mm). ViV TAVI with Portico or Navitor valves was successful in 46 cases (97.9%), with no in-hospital mortality or need for emergency cardiac surgery. Technical success was achieved in 89.4% of cases; failures were related to two major vascular complications, two valve-related interventions, and one major cardiac structural complication. At 30 days, device success and safety outcomes were favorable, with no deaths or additional major complications. Two patients (4.3%) experienced ischemic stroke, and one (2.8%) required a new permanent pacemaker. Most patients (97.8%) were in NYHA class I-II. Echocardiography confirmed intended valve performance in 87% of cases, with no moderate or severe aortic regurgitation.
Conclusions: ViV TAVI with Portico and Navitor valves is a safe and effective option for failed surgical bioprostheses, including small valves, offering excellent short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess long-term durability.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70176 | DOI Listing |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Center, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Background: Degeneration of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves is increasingly common. Redo surgical aortic valve replacement carries substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly or high-risk patients. Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an established alternative, though data on the performance of self-expanding Portico and Navitor valves remain limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Funct Biomater
August 2025
Department of Surgery IV, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
The main objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis, focusing on differences between self-expanding valve (SEV) versus balloon-expandable valve (BEV) prostheses and the influence of balloon pre- and post-dilatation on clinical results. The secondary objective was to report the long-term outcomes after TAVI in Romania. All patients who underwent a TAVI procedure for severe AS between November 2016 and May 2025 at a tertiary center in Romania were included in the present study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCatheter Cardiovasc Interv
August 2025
Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis, but there is limited comparative data on balloon-expandable (BEV) versus self-expanding valves (SEV) in this population.
Aim: To compare clinical and hemodynamic outcomes between BEVs and SEVs in patients with BAV stenosis.
Methods: This observational cohort included all patients who underwent TAVR in Sweden between 2016 and 2022.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
June 2025
Interventional Cardiology Unit, Ospedale S. Maria, GVM Care & Research, Bari, Italy.
Background: As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now performed in patients with longer life expectancy, the need for coronary access (CA) after TAVR is expected to rise.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of CA after TAVR with 4 different types of transcatheter heart valves (THVs).
Methods: In the multicenter, prospective CAvEAT (Coronary Access After TAVI; NCT04647864) registry, coronary angiography was performed immediately following transfemoral TAVR using short-frame SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN 3 Ultra (SAPIEN 3/Ultra) and tall-frame ACURATE neo or ACURATE neo2 (ACURATE neo/neo2), Portico or Navitor, and Evolut Pro or Evolut Pro+ (Evolut Pro/Pro+) THVs.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc
August 2025
Department of Cardiology Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Background: Limited data exist on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. This study compared TAVR outcomes in BAV versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.
Methods: This observational study included all patients who underwent TAVR in Sweden from 2016 to 2022, excluding those with pure aortic insufficiency and valve-in-valve procedures.