Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Degeneration of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves is increasingly common. Redo surgical aortic valve replacement carries substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly or high-risk patients. Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an established alternative, though data on the performance of self-expanding Portico and Navitor valves remain limited.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 47 consecutive patients who underwent ViV TAVI for severe bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction between January 2020 and June 2024 at Barts Heart Center. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were evaluated using Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria.

Results: The median age was 79 years, and 80.9% had small surgical valves (≤ 23 mm). ViV TAVI with Portico or Navitor valves was successful in 46 cases (97.9%), with no in-hospital mortality or need for emergency cardiac surgery. Technical success was achieved in 89.4% of cases; failures were related to two major vascular complications, two valve-related interventions, and one major cardiac structural complication. At 30 days, device success and safety outcomes were favorable, with no deaths or additional major complications. Two patients (4.3%) experienced ischemic stroke, and one (2.8%) required a new permanent pacemaker. Most patients (97.8%) were in NYHA class I-II. Echocardiography confirmed intended valve performance in 87% of cases, with no moderate or severe aortic regurgitation.

Conclusions: ViV TAVI with Portico and Navitor valves is a safe and effective option for failed surgical bioprostheses, including small valves, offering excellent short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess long-term durability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70176DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

portico navitor
16
navitor valves
16
aortic valve
12
viv tavi
12
short-term outcomes
8
barts heart
8
heart center
8
bioprosthetic aortic
8
tavi portico
8
valves
7

Similar Publications

Background: Degeneration of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves is increasingly common. Redo surgical aortic valve replacement carries substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly or high-risk patients. Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an established alternative, though data on the performance of self-expanding Portico and Navitor valves remain limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The main objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis, focusing on differences between self-expanding valve (SEV) versus balloon-expandable valve (BEV) prostheses and the influence of balloon pre- and post-dilatation on clinical results. The secondary objective was to report the long-term outcomes after TAVI in Romania. All patients who underwent a TAVI procedure for severe AS between November 2016 and May 2025 at a tertiary center in Romania were included in the present study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis, but there is limited comparative data on balloon-expandable (BEV) versus self-expanding valves (SEV) in this population.

Aim: To compare clinical and hemodynamic outcomes between BEVs and SEVs in patients with BAV stenosis.

Methods: This observational cohort included all patients who underwent TAVR in Sweden between 2016 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Coronary Access After TAVI (CAvEAT) Study: A Prospective Registry of CA After TAVR.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv

June 2025

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Ospedale S. Maria, GVM Care & Research, Bari, Italy.

Background: As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now performed in patients with longer life expectancy, the need for coronary access (CA) after TAVR is expected to rise.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of CA after TAVR with 4 different types of transcatheter heart valves (THVs).

Methods: In the multicenter, prospective CAvEAT (Coronary Access After TAVI; NCT04647864) registry, coronary angiography was performed immediately following transfemoral TAVR using short-frame SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN 3 Ultra (SAPIEN 3/Ultra) and tall-frame ACURATE neo or ACURATE neo2 (ACURATE neo/neo2), Portico or Navitor, and Evolut Pro or Evolut Pro+ (Evolut Pro/Pro+) THVs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Limited data exist on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. This study compared TAVR outcomes in BAV versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.

Methods: This observational study included all patients who underwent TAVR in Sweden from 2016 to 2022, excluding those with pure aortic insufficiency and valve-in-valve procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF