Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
This study evaluated the cryoresistance of stallion sperm frozen by ultra-rapid (UR) methods using microspheres and straws or by the conventionally-slow (CS) method. Sixteen ejaculates from four stallions were each divided into three aliquots according to the freezing method: UR freezing in 30-μL spheres (UR-Spheres) by direct immersion in liquid nitrogen (LN); UR freezing in 0.25-mL straws (UR-Straws) by direct horizontal submersion in LN; and CS freezing in LN vapors. Ultra-rapid freezing medium included 100 mM trehalose +1 % BSA, and the CS freezing medium contained 5 % dimethylformamide. Conventional-slow freezing yielded higher sperm cryoresistance than both UR freezing methods (P < 0.05). UR-Spheres produced higher values of sperm kinematic, viability, and acrosomal integrity than UR-Straws (P < 0.05). Sperm head area and perimeter in both UR freezing groups increased compared to fresh and CS frozen samples (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the UR-Spheres method produced greater cryoresistance of stallion semen than UR-Straw method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2025.105303 | DOI Listing |