A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Optimal Dosage Characteristics of Recasting for Developmental Language Disorder: A Scoping Review. | LitMetric

Optimal Dosage Characteristics of Recasting for Developmental Language Disorder: A Scoping Review.

J Speech Lang Hear Res

School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this scoping review was to map and summarize currently available evidence about optimal dosage of recasting for developmental language disorder (DLD).

Method: A systematic search of databases was completed, including Web of Science, Medline via OvidSP, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria comprised the involvement of DLD intervention, the use of recasting alone or predominantly, and systematic manipulation of one or more dosage characteristics of recasting with the remaining parameters consistent across groups. Single-case experimental design studies were also included.

Results: A total of 1,289 studies were included in the review, but only four articles met the criteria. Stratification analysis of an expanded set of 32 publications was then performed for effective dosage values, according to the way recasting was implemented. The effective quantitative dosage of recasting that has often been used is either an intervention duration > 8 weeks including a recast rate > 1.4/min within 30-min sessions, twice per week without high variability input, or a 5-week intervention including a recast rate of 0.8/min within 30-min sessions, five times per week with high variability input.

Conclusions: Differences in the way dosage has been described and manipulated in the existing literature mean that the optimal dosage characteristics of recasting for DLD remain unknown. We propose ways to conceptualize dose and dose frequency to avoid ambiguities within the current framework of dosage. This review identifies ways that dosage characteristics of recasting for DLD can be manipulated and reported when designing interventions.

Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30015529.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00885DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dosage characteristics
16
characteristics recasting
16
optimal dosage
12
recasting
8
recasting developmental
8
developmental language
8
language disorder
8
scoping review
8
dosage
8
dosage recasting
8

Similar Publications