A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Kinematic and Kinetic Effects of 10-Degree Coronal Wedge Floors on Lower Limb Joints During Static Standing: An Upright Multidetector-Row CT Study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Coronal wedge insoles are commonly prescribed to mitigate musculoskeletal disorders, yet their static-standing kinematic and kinetic effects on lower extremity joints remain insufficiently understood.

Methods: This cross-sectional experimental study included 15 healthy older adults (mean 64.9 ± 6.0 y; 11 females, 4 males) who underwent CT imaging of the entire lower limbs during static standing. Ground reaction forces (GRFs) were simultaneously recorded using right and left force plates, with their sum equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the body weight vector. Three floor conditions were tested: a 10-degree medial wedge, a flat surface, and a 10-degree lateral wedge. Lower limb alignment, GRF vector inclinations, projected GRF location at the height of the joint center, and external joint moments were assessed under 3 floor conditions.

Results: Coronal wedges altered hip and subtalar joint angles, with medial wedges inducing hindfoot supination and hip abduction, whereas lateral wedges promoted hindfoot pronation and hip internal rotation. The GRF vector was found to generally pass lateral to the tibiotalar and subtalar joints and medial to the hip joint, generating eversion and adduction moments, respectively. Notably, these moments increased on the lateral wedge but were reduced on the medial wedge. In contrast, projected GRF location at joint height remained near the knee joint center across all conditions, resulting in minimal varus/valgus knee moments.

Conclusion: This study provides the first quantifications of the 3-dimensional GRF vector concerning joint centers during static standing; these exploratory findings warrant confirmation during gait and in symptomatic cohorts. Our study suggests that lateral wedges tend to increase external joint moments at the hip and tibiotalar. Although further investigation is needed, these mechanical effects at the hip may have potential relevance and should be considered with caution when prescribing lateral wedge insoles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10711007251361132DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

static standing
12
lateral wedge
12
grf vector
12
kinematic kinetic
8
kinetic effects
8
coronal wedge
8
lower limb
8
wedge insoles
8
medial wedge
8
projected grf
8

Similar Publications