Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (MPJE), despite its name, does not facilitate multistate pharmacy practice, instead requiring pharmacists to pass separate, state-specific law examinations-a process that is increasingly seen as outdated and inefficient. The proposed Uniform MPJE, targeted to launch in 2026, aims to standardize pharmacy law testing nationwide. This article examines the rationale behind the MPJE, questioning the necessity of any pharmacy law examination in an era of technological advancement, evolving regulatory models, and interprofessional parity. With some states already eliminating the MPJE without evidence of public harm, eliminating any law examination may be more aligned with the future of pharmacy practice rather than adopting a new examination.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10600280251371675 | DOI Listing |