Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To evaluate the association between low-volume chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and delay in patient care.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent CVS from 8/19/2019 to 12/31/2022 in a single center. The exposure was low-volume CVS, defined as less than 15 mg of sample. The primary outcome of delay in patient care, was a composite of need for repeat procedure, delay in karyotype results ≥14 days, and ≥14 days to time of pregnancy termination. Secondary outcomes included change in lab protocol and canceled fluorescence hybridization (FISH) tests.
Results: There were 305 patients included with 113 (37%) with low-volume CVS. The primary outcome of delay in patient care occurred more often in the low-volume group compared to the high-volume group (23.9% vs 10.4% OR 2.70 95% CI 1.43-5.09). This association persisted in the adjusted models after adjusting for significant covariates. However, the individual outcome of delay to pregnancy termination was not different between the groups, even with controlling for covariates (14.2% vs 8.9% OR 1.70 95% CI 0.82-3.51).
Conclusion: Low-volume CVS was associated with an increased of delay in genetic testing results but did not increase the time to pregnancy termination in patients who opted for this outcome.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2025.2522998 | DOI Listing |