A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Incidence, risk factors, and machine learning prediction models of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to comprehensively describe the clinical characteristics of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures (TVFs), and to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of rib fractures.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with TVFs at a single hospital between January 2007 and November 2024, enrolling 1420 patients and 20 variables. Chest CT scans were used to confirm the presence of rib fractures and to examine their distribution characteristics. Several ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Naive Bayes (NB), Neural Network (NN), and Ensemble Learning (EL), were applied. Model performance was evaluated using indicators such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, density, discrimination slope, and a scoring system. Additionally, the prediction performance of the ML models was compared with that of three experienced clinicians.

Results: Rib fractures were identified in 222 patients (15.6 %), with a total of 1035 rib fractures recorded. Only 22.5 % were single rib fractures, and the distribution of unilateral and bilateral fractures was comparable (54.5 % vs. 45.5 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed four significant predictors of rib fractures: gender (P = 0.004), cardiovascular disease (P = 0.003), trauma mechanism (P < 0.001), and the number of thoracic fractures (P < 0.001). Among all models, the EL model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.920, F1 score of 0.767, sensitivity of 0.683, specificity of 0.977, PPV of 0.875, NPV of 0.928, and the highest overall score (48). Notably, its performance surpassed that of all three clinicians.

Conclusions: Rib fractures are relatively common in patients with TVFs and may be underdiagnosed, especially in the absence of clear symptoms. The EL model developed in this study offers strong predictive capability and may serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool to identify high-risk patients and reduce the likelihood of missed diagnoses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112728DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rib fractures
32
fractures
12
rib
9
machine learning
8
fractures patients
8
patients traumatic
8
traumatic thoracic
8
thoracic vertebral
8
vertebral fractures
8
logistic regression
8

Similar Publications