A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Clinical impact of mean pulmonary arterial pressure after balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) improves haemodynamics in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Previous studies on BPA have set the treatment objective to achieve a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of <30 mm Hg. However, the clinical impact of mPAP after BPA remains unclear. This study aimed to stratify patients according to their mPAP after BPA and evaluate its association with clinical status and long-term outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients with inoperable CTEPH (median age, 72 (61 to 79) years) who underwent BPA and follow-up right heart catheterisation. Patients were categorised by mPAP after BPA: ≤20, >20-<30 and ≥30 mm Hg groups.

Results: The WHO functional classification, 6 min walk distance and right ventricular ejection fraction were significantly better in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p=0.007, p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Additionally, the proportions of patients who required pulmonary vasodilators or oxygen therapy were significantly lower in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Across all multivariable models, the mPAP ≥30 mm Hg group had a significantly poorer prognosis compared with the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg group. In contrast, no significant difference was observed between the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg and >20-<30 mm Hg groups.

Conclusions: In patients with CTEPH after BPA, an mPAP of <30 mm Hg was associated with a favourable prognosis, and patients with an mPAP of ≤20 mm Hg presented with better symptoms, exercise capacity, right ventricular function and more withdrawal from oxygen therapy and pulmonary vasodilators. The BPA treatment goal may require individual adaptation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003532DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414211PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulmonary arterial
8
arterial pressure
8
balloon pulmonary
8
pulmonary angioplasty
8
inoperable chronic
8
chronic thromboembolic
8
thromboembolic pulmonary
8
pulmonary hypertension
8
pulmonary
6
clinical impact
4

Similar Publications