Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of single-fraction, high-gradient partial breast irradiation (BreaStBRT) as a post-operative treatment in patients with early-stage, hormone-positive breast cancer. It aims to assess acute and late treatment-related toxicity, cosmesis, patient-reported quality of life (QoL), and oncologic outcomes.
Materials And Methods: Single-institution, single-arm, phase II prospective trial included post-menopausal women ≥50 years old with early-stage, hormone-positive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) followed by BreaStBRT. Patients were treated in a single-fraction with a high-gradient by delivering a dose of 15-22 Gy to the surgical bed with a steep fall off to a minimum of 5 Gy to a 1 cm isometric expansion from the surgical bed; most patients were treated with MRI-guided radiation therapy. Primary endpoints included acute and late toxicity and 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Secondary endpoints included regional-node recurrence, distant metastasis, mastectomy-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS), along with patient-reported cosmesis and QoL assessments.
Results: Fifty patients were treated between 2015 and 2018. Median follow-up was 78 months. Acute and late radiation-related toxicities were observed in 44% and 68% of patients, respectively; no acute grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported, and one instance of late grade 3 fibrosis was observed. 5-year IBTR, MFS, and OS were 4%, 98%, and 92%, respectively. Cosmesis was rated as good to excellent in over 90% of cases by both patients and physicians through 5-year follow up. QoL assessments showed stable global health, physical functioning, sexual functioning, and body image results through follow up.
Conclusions: BreaStBRT provides promising oncologic outcomes and favorable long-term cosmesis and QoL results with a low rate of treatment-related toxicity. This convenient regimen offers a viable alternative for carefully selected early-stage, hormone-positive breast cancer patients. Further comparative trials are warranted to solidify the role of BreaStBRT in clinical practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1410 | DOI Listing |