Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma:5-Year Safety Results from a Randomized, Multicenter Study.

Ophthalmol Glaucoma

NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, England; Discipline of Clinical Ophthalmology and Eye Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare the long-term safety of MicroShunt implantation with trabeculectomy in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: This was a 3-year observational extension of a 2-year prospective randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes of MicroShunt implantation with trabeculectomy, both augmented with mitomycin C. Adverse events (AEs), intraocular pressure (IOP), and IOP-lowering medication use were recorded 36, 48, and 60 months after initial randomization. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of sight-threatening AEs. Secondary outcomes included all other AEs/complications, secondary interventions, and reductions in IOP and number of glaucoma medications.

Results: The extension study enrolled 279 patients (217 MicroShunt, 62 trabeculectomy), with 256 (198 and 58, respectively) completing the month 60 visit. Rates of sight-threatening AEs were 2% (n=4) in the MicroShunt group and 0% in the trabeculectomy group, with one eye each in the MicroShunt group having central retinal artery occlusion, choroidal hemorrhage (following placement of a glaucoma drainage device), progressive endothelial cell loss, and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Only two of the four sight-threatening AEs in the MicroShunt group were deemed related to the study device or procedure. Four eyes in the MicroShunt group experienced device erosion through the conjunctiva. Increased IOP requiring treatment was more frequent (26% versus 8%, P=0.0017), whereas hypotony (3% versus 13%, P=0.038), epiretinal membrane formation (2% versus 8%; P=0.028), and blepharoptosis (4% versus 11%, P=0.048) were less frequent, in the MicroShunt group. Four patients in the trabeculectomy group required surgical revision for hypotony. Changes in endothelial cell density were similar in the MicroShunt (-19% ± 22%) and trabeculectomy (-19% ± 22%) groups, with a mean between-group difference of 0.1% (P=0.98). Mean ± SD IOP was reduced from 20.8 ± 4.9 mmHg at baseline to 14.2 ± 4.1 mmHg at month 60 in MicroShunt eyes (mean reduction, 5.5 mmHg [26%]) and from 20.1 ± 3.9 mmHg to 10.4 ± 3.7 mmHg in trabeculectomy eyes (mean reduction, 9.1 mmHg [45%]), with a between-group difference of -4.6 mmHg (P<0.0001).

Conclusion: Both filtering procedures demonstrated favorable safety profiles over 5 years. Most AEs through 5 years did not necessitate reoperation nor result in vision-threatening complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2025.08.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

microshunt group
20
sight-threatening aes
12
microshunt
10
trabeculectomy
8
primary open-angle
8
microshunt implantation
8
implantation trabeculectomy
8
trabeculectomy eyes
8
trabeculectomy group
8
endothelial cell
8

Similar Publications

Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma:5-Year Safety Results from a Randomized, Multicenter Study.

Ophthalmol Glaucoma

September 2025

NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, England; Discipline of Clinical Ophthalmology and Eye Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Purpose: To compare the long-term safety of MicroShunt implantation with trabeculectomy in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: This was a 3-year observational extension of a 2-year prospective randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes of MicroShunt implantation with trabeculectomy, both augmented with mitomycin C. Adverse events (AEs), intraocular pressure (IOP), and IOP-lowering medication use were recorded 36, 48, and 60 months after initial randomization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To characterize and compare the efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy and Preserflo microshunt (PMS) implantation in patients with openangle glaucoma.

Material And Methods: This retrospective 6-month study included 100 eyes (100 patients). The 100 patients were divided into two groups of 50 patients, who were randomly assigned to either trabeculectomy or PMS implantation with mmC (0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The success of minimally invasive bleb surgery (MIBS) such as the PreserFlo MicroShunt (PFMS) is limited by post-operative bleb fibrosis. Current clinical practice prescribes the use of off-label cytotoxic antimetabolites such as Mitomycin C (MMC) as antifibrotic therapy. This study investigates the anti-scarring properties of a novel compound, 3',4'-Dihydroxyflavonol (DiOHF) in a rabbit model of PFMS filtration surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The PRESERFLO MicroShunt is an 8.5-mm-long (70-µm lumen) controlled ab externo filtration surgery device made from poly[styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene] (SIBS). Three prospective, open-label clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The Preserflo-MicroShunt (PF) is an established device for treating glaucoma, effectively reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) with a good safety record. However, its efficacy in eyes with significantly elevated preoperative IOP levels is not well-documented due to exclusion from many clinical studies. This study aims to evaluate PF outcomes in eyes with highly increased IOP and compare them with those having moderately increased levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF