Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Total body water (TBW) is commonly used to derive estimates of body composition. The deuterium oxide dose-to-mother (DTM) technique for measuring breast milk intake requires an estimate of infant TBW. The DTM calculation employs a prediction equation for estimating infant TBW from body weight (TBW), but the general validity of this equation is unknown.
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the bias of TBW predicted by the equation used in DTM calculations (TBW); derive a new equation based on a multicountry dataset of TBW measured by isotope dilution (TBW) in breastfed infants, 0.5 (2 wk) to 24 mo old; and quantify the impact of the new equation on measurements of breast milk and nonmilk water intake using the DTM technique.
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of 3756 TBW measurements from 1457 infants, which were compared to TBW using the Bland-Altman method and used to generate a new prediction equation. Values of breast milk intake and nonmilk water intake from 130 DTM calculation spreadsheets were compared with recalculated values using the Bland-Altman method.
Results: TBW underestimates TBW, with absolute and relative bias increasing with age (3 mo: -1.4% ± 9.2%; 24 mo: -11.3% ± 8.3%) and differential by sex (males: -6.4% ± 9.6%; females: -2.4% ± 9.9%). The best prediction equation incorporates log weight, age, and sex, explaining 93.7% of the variability in log TBW. Applying this new equation in DTM calculations results in higher estimates of breast milk and nonmilk water intake; for example, in infants aged 6-12 mo, differences averaged 26 g/d (limits of agreement: -17, 69) and 13 g/d (limits of agreement: -10, 36), respectively.
Conclusions: The equation used in DTM calculations provides biased TBW estimates. This has implications for measuring breast milk intake and nonmilk water intake and our understanding of nutritional needs during the first 2 y of life.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.004 | DOI Listing |