A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Independent effects of working memory loads and facial expressions on event-related potential (ERP) responses: Evidence from mass univariate analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Previous studies have investigated whether event-related potential (ERP) responses to negative and positive facial expressions are modulated by perceptual and working memory loads of face-irrelevant tasks, but results have been mixed. These studies typically employed traditional analysis methods that focus on a limited number of electrodes and timepoints, which increases the risk of statistical errors. Moreover, no studies have investigated these issues for emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate whether working memory loads influence ERP effects of positive, negative and importantly, emotionally ambiguous (e.g., surprised) facial expressions by using robust Mass Univariate Analysis (MUA). To address these issues, thirty-three participants were presented with angry, happy, surprised or neutral faces. Participants were required to memorize a letter (low working memory loads) or 5 letters (high loads) before face presentations and to recognize them afterwards. ERP results showed that working memory loads and facial expressions independently affected ERP responses, with no significant interaction. Working memory loads influenced ERP responses starting after the P100 peak. Regarding the effect of facial expressions, surprised facial expressions generally weakened late positive potential (LPP) responses compared to other facial expressions, and happy facial expressions weakened the responses at early time ranges, while angry facial expressions enhanced LPP responses at distinct electrode sites depending on the comparison. These findings underscore the value of employing MUA for comprehensive ERP analysis in face processing research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109116DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facial expressions
40
working memory
24
memory loads
24
erp responses
16
facial
10
expressions
10
loads facial
8
event-related potential
8
potential erp
8
mass univariate
8

Similar Publications