Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To determine the effect of adjunctive rose-bengal photodynamic therapy (RB-PDT) in the treatment of fungal, Acanthamoeba, and smear/culture negative infectious keratitis.
Study Design: This international, randomized, double-masked, sham controlled clinical trial, randomizes patients with corneal ulcers in a 1:1 fashion to one of two treatment arms: 1) Topical antimicrobial plus sham RB-PDT or 2) Topical antimicrobial plus RB-PDT.
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included BSCVA at 3 weeks and 3 months, infiltrate and/or scar size at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months, corneal perforation (CP) and/or the rate of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK), microbiological cure rate.
Results: A total of 330 patients were enrolled. Isolated organisms included filamentous fungus (N=301; 91%), Acanthamoeba (N=10; 3%) and culture/smear negative (N=19; 6%). There was no evidence of a benefit of RB-PDT versus sham for BSCVA at 6 months (-0.0004; 95% CI -0.13 to 0.13; P=0.62). There was evidence of a statistically significant interaction between treatment arm and fungal organism with regards to BSCVA (P=0.02). RB-PDT improved BSCVA among eyes with Fusarium infections (difference = -0.17 logMAR, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.03) but worsened BSCVA among eyes with Aspergillus infections (difference = 0.39 95% CI -0.03 to 0.80 logMAR). Scar size was 0.45 mm smaller in the RB-PDT group at 3 weeks (95% CI -0.76 to -0.15; P=0.004) but this finding was no longer statistically significant at 3 and 6 months. There was no difference between groups in rates of CP/TPK or microbiological cure.
Conclusions: We were unable to find a benefit of adjuvant RB-PDT overall. Future directions may include trying alternative photosensitizers and/or other treatment algorithms.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.08.027 | DOI Listing |