A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Prediction of NAC Response in LARC by Integrating MRI and Proteomics. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) exhibits significant heterogeneity in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), with poor responders facing delayed treatment and unnecessary toxicity. Although MRI provides spatial pathophysiological information and proteomics reveals molecular mechanisms, current single-modal approaches cannot integrate these complementary perspectives, resulting in limited predictive accuracy and biological insight.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study developed a multimodal deep learning framework using a cohort of 274 LARC patients treated with NAC (2012-2021). Graph neural networks analyzed proteomic profiles from FFPE tissues, incorporating KEGG/GO pathways and PPI networks, while a spatially enhanced 3D ResNet152 processed T2WI. A LightGBM classifier integrated both modalities with clinical features using zero-imputation for missing data. Model performance was assessed through AUC-ROC, decision curve analysis, and interpretability techniques (SHAP and Grad-CAM).

Results: The integrated model achieved superior NAC response prediction (test AUC 0.828, sensitivity 0.875, specificity 0.750), significantly outperforming single-modal approaches (MRI ΔAUC +0.109; proteomics ΔAUC +0.125). SHAP analysis revealed MRI-derived features contributed 57.7% of predictive power, primarily through peritumoral stromal heterogeneity quantification. Proteomics identified 10 key chemoresistance proteins, including CYBA, GUSB, ATP6AP2, DYNC1I2, DAD1, ACOX1, COPG1, FBP1, DHRS7, and SSR3. Decision curve analysis confirmed clinical utility across threshold probabilities (0-0.75).

Conclusion: Our study established a novel MRI-proteomics integration framework for NAC response prediction, with MRI defining spatial resistance patterns and proteomics deciphering molecular drivers, enabling early organ preservation strategies. The zero-imputation design ensured deplorability in diverse clinical settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.707DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nac response
12
single-modal approaches
8
decision curve
8
curve analysis
8
response prediction
8
nac
5
proteomics
5
deep learning-based
4
learning-based multimodal
4
multimodal prediction
4

Similar Publications