Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Recreational diving with self-contained underwater breathing devices is gaining popularity worldwide as a sport and leisure activity. People living with type 1 diabetes mellitus (PLT1D) are no exception, although historically diabetes mellitus, especially insulin-treated, has been described as an absolute contra-indication for diving. However, based on observational data collected by the Divers Alert Network, the presence of background diabetes mellitus became only a relative contraindication for those without significant co-morbidities or long-term complications. Regarding diving activities among PLT1D, the primary concern is the risk of hypoglycaemia, especially in those with impaired awareness. Furthermore, symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia could be confused with those originating from other factors related to diving. Although avoidance of hypoglycaemia is imperative among PLT1D practicing diving, the risk of severe hyperglycaemia should also be minimised. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) nowadays represents the standard of care for PLT1D, but its accuracy during diving activities is still a matter of debate. This commentary aims to summarize the existing data on accuracy, durability, and underwater performance of different CGM devices among PLT1D who engage in diving, and to call for additional research in the field. Based on available results, the application of real-time CGM still requires extreme caution since none of the existing systems has so far met the standards for accurate use in underwater conditions. Further improvements of contemporary CGM devices, validated through large-scale trials, are necessary before their widespread implementation among PLT1D practicing diving. Such advances should further enhance safety during this popular activity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399892 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S538152 | DOI Listing |