A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Assessment of liver stiffness measurement-related markers in predicting liver-related events in viral cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is a crucial prognostic determinant for liver-related events (LREs) in patients with compensated viral cirrhosis. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM)-related markers may help to predict the risk of LREs.

Aim: To evaluate the value of LSM and its composite biomarkers [LSM-platelet ratio (LPR), LSM-albumin ratio (LAR)] in predicting LREs.

Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled compensated viral cirrhosis patients with CSPH. The Cox regression model was employed to examine the prediction of LSM, LPR, and LAR for LREs. The model performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic, decision curve, and time-dependent area under the curve analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of LREs, and further stratified analysis of different LREs was performed.

Results: A total of 598 patients were included, and 319 patients (53.3%) developed LREs during follow-up. Multivariate proportional hazards modeling demonstrated that LSM, LPR, and LAR were independent predictors of LREs. LPR had better performance in predicting LREs than LAR and LSM (area under the curve = 0.780, 0.727, 0.683, respectively, all < 0.05). The cumulative incidence of LREs in the high-risk group were significantly higher than that in the low-risk group ( < 0.001). Among the different LREs, LPR was superior to LSM and LAR in predicting liver decompensation, while the difference in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death was relatively small.

Conclusion: LPR is superior to LSM and LAR in predicting LREs in compensated viral cirrhosis patients with CSPH, especially in predicting liver decompensation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400439PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.109796DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

viral cirrhosis
16
compensated viral
12
lres
10
liver stiffness
8
liver-related events
8
clinically portal
8
portal hypertension
8
cirrhosis patients
8
patients csph
8
lsm lpr
8

Similar Publications