Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT represents a transformative advancement in radiological imaging, offering superior spatial resolution, enhanced contrast-to-noise ratio, and reduced radiation dose compared with the conventional energy-integrating detector CT.
Aim: To evaluate PCD CT in oncologic imaging, focusing on its role in tumor detection, staging, and treatment response assessment.
Methods: We performed a systematic PubMed search from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2024, using the keywords "photon-counting CT", "cancer", and "tumor" to identify studies on its use in oncologic imaging. We included experimental studies on humans or human phantoms and excluded reviews, commentaries, editorials, non-English, animal, and non-experimental studies. Study selection followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Out of 175 initial studies, 39 met the inclusion criteria after screening and full-text review. Data extraction focused on study type, country of origin, and oncologic applications of photon-counting CT. No formal risk of bias assessment was performed, and the review was not registered in PROSPERO as it did not include a meta-analysis.
Results: Key findings highlighted the advantages of PCD CT in imaging renal masses, adrenal adenomas, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic tumors, hepatocellular carcinoma, metastases, multiple myeloma, and lung cancer. Additionally, PCD CT has demonstrated improved lesion characterization and enhanced diagnostic accuracy in oncology. Despite its promising capabilities challenges related to data processing, storage, and accessibility remain.
Conclusion: As PCD CT technology evolves, its integration into routine oncologic imaging has the potential to significantly enhance cancer diagnosis and patient management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400258 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i8.107732 | DOI Listing |