A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

[Effectiveness of "brain-computer" interfaces with biofeedback in the rehabilitation of cognitive impairment after a stroke]. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Comparison of the effectiveness of two "brain-computer" interface (BCI) software complexes using biofeedback (BF) and standard therapy in restoring cognitive functions after a stroke.

Material And Methods: Eighty-nine stroke patients were examined. Neuropsychological testing was carried out using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), the Tracking test, the Wechsler subtest 9 Kohs block design test, the Schulte tables, the Memorization of 10 Words test (according to A.R. Luria). Using the simple randomization method, three groups were formed: the main group (37), the comparison group (33) and the control group (19). In Group 1, sessions were conducted with BCI+BF based on the rhythm P300; in Group 2, with BCI+BF based on the mu-rhythm of electroencephalography (EEG), Group 3 received standard therapy.

Results: An increase in the total MoCA score was reported in all three groups. The results in Groups 1 and 2 were comparable, exceeding those in Group 3 (=0.199, <0.001, =0.037). The effectiveness in Group 1 did not depend on the baseline MoCA score, exceeding the indicators in Group 3; in Group 2, the advantage over Group 3 was with a baseline MoCA of at least 22. According to the Schulte tables and the Tracking test, comparable statistically significant changes were obtained in Groups 1 and 2; no statistically significant change was reported in the control group. The Kohs block design test showed a more statistically significant change in the main group. The Memorization of 10 Words test by A.R. Luria also showed a more consistent improvement in mnestic disorders in the main group.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of BCI+BF exceeded standard therapy for post-stroke cognitive impairment. The advantage of IMC+BFB used in the main group over IMC+BFB in the comparison group was noted, which was due to a decrease in the effectiveness of the latter with a baseline MoCA score of less than 22 points, lower performance in the Memorizing 10 Words test and the Kohs block design test.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202512508254DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three groups
8
bci+bf based
8
group
7
[effectiveness "brain-computer"
4
"brain-computer" interfaces
4
interfaces biofeedback
4
biofeedback rehabilitation
4
rehabilitation cognitive
4
cognitive impairment
4
impairment stroke]
4

Similar Publications