Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Current European, American and Australasian guidelines recommend revascularisation for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by immediate or "primary" percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), or if pPCI cannot be performed within 120 minutes, by thrombolysis followed by rescue PCI. This latter approach, despite its limitations, remains a cornerstone of STEMI care in rural and remote settings, where pPCI is not immediately available, and where one-third of the Australian population live. This review evaluates the current status of thrombolysis and rescue PCI in rural and remote settings, examines the multiple changes that have occurred since its inception, and highlights persisting gaps in knowledge, to provide an up-to-date evaluation of this field, and an outlook for future directions, in this area of ongoing change.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.06.1035 | DOI Listing |