Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Peer support is increasingly recognized as a valuable method for managing blood glucose levels and reducing the risk of chronic complications in patients with diabetes. This systematic review and meta-analysis specifically evaluated the effect of peer support on HbA1c levels in middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes and explored the potential benefits of peer interactions on glycemic control.
Methodology: A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases from January 2018 to July 2023, with a focus on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared peer support interventions to standard diabetic care in adults. Among the 3,395 articles identified, eleven studies involving 2,187 participants were included. The quality of each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the mean difference (MD) in HbA1c changes, with additional subgroup analyses for specific contexts.
Results: The findings revealed a modest but statistically significant improvement in HbA1c levels in groups receiving peer support (MD: -0.20; 95% CI [-0.37 to -0.02]; = 0.03). More pronounced benefits were observed in interventions conducted within formal medical settings, those involving high-frequency contact, and those in group sessions, particularly among elderly patients.
Conclusions: The results suggest that while peer support provides a slight improvement in HbA1c levels, other intervention strategies-such as frequent contact, group sessions, and formal medical settings-may offer greater glycemic control benefits in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings support incorporating peer support into diabetes care and underscore the need for further research with larger samples and standardized protocols.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399075 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19803 | DOI Listing |