Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Mendelian randomization (MR) has become an important technique for establishing causal relationships between risk factors and health outcomes. By using genetic variants as instrumental variables, it can mitigate bias due to confounding and reverse causation in observational studies. Current MR analyses have predominantly used common genetic variants as instruments, which represent only part of the genetic architecture of complex traits. Rare variants, which can have larger effect sizes and provide unique biological insights, have been understudied due to statistical and methodological challenges. We introduce MR-CARV, a novel framework integrating common and rare genetic variants in two-sample Mendelian randomization. This method leverages comprehensive genetic data made available by high-throughput sequencing technologies and large-scale consortia. Rare variants are aggregated into functional categories, such as gene-coding, gene-noncoding, and non-gene regions, by leveraging variant annotations and biological impact as weights. The effects of rare variant sets are then estimated with STAARpipeline and combined with the estimated effects of common variants by the existing MR methods. Simulation studies demonstrate that MR-CARV maintains robust type I error and achieves higher statistical power, with up to a 66.3% relative increase compared to existing methods only based on common variants. Consistent with these findings, application to real data on HDL-C and preeclampsia showed that MR-CARV(IVW) yielded a more precise and statistically significant effect estimate (-0.021, SE = 0.0101, P = 0.0365) than IVW using only common variants (-0.024, SE = 0.0123, P = 0.0538).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393653 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.20.25334100 | DOI Listing |