A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion does not increase the risk of infection after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is a crucial treatment for end-stage liver disease, but the limited organ supply has led to the use of extended criteria donors (ECD). The implementation of dynamic preservation techniques like hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) is crucial in improving outcomes for ECD grafts. However, graft contamination and infection are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of infections within 10 days from LT between HOPE and static cold storage (SCS) groups and postoperative complications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including LT recipients transplanted at a single-center from March 2016 to June 2023. Patients were divided into HOPE and SCS groups, and propensity score matching was used to select comparable cohorts. Data on patient and donor characteristics were analyzed.

Results: After propensity score matching, a cohort of 370 (HOPE, n=185; SCS, n=185) patients was selected for analysis. The study found no significant differences in the rate of clinically relevant infections, microbiological positive samples, or donor-derived infections within 10 days between HOPE and SCS groups. Postoperative outcomes, as well as patient and graft survival, were also similar between the two groups. The study showed that HOPE is a feasible and safe approach, with a comparable risk of infection.

Conclusions: The study results indicate that HOPE use in LT does not increase the risk of infection and is associated with similar patient and graft survival outcomes compared to SCS. These findings confirm the safety and efficacy of HOPE in LT and its potential to expand the donor pool without compromising recipient outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393111PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-24-552DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scs groups
12
hypothermic oxygenated
8
oxygenated machine
8
machine perfusion
8
increase risk
8
risk infection
8
liver transplantation
8
retrospective cohort
8
cohort study
8
hope
8

Similar Publications