A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Evaluating photoplethysmography-based pulsewave parameters and composite scores for assessment of cardiac function: A comparison with echocardiography. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: This study assesses the utility of photoplethysmography (PPG) as a non-invasive method to evaluate cardiac function, addressing the critical need for accessible biomarkers in various cardiovascular conditions, including heart failure management.

Methods: By conducting simultaneous echocardiography and PPG measurements on 37 healthy volunteers, we analyzed both traditional and novel composite pulse wave scores to correlate peripheral PPG data with central echocardiographic outcomes.

Results: Our results show a good correlation between PPG-based and echocardiography-derived ejection times (r = 0.648, P < 0.001), though Bland-Altmann analysis results reveal that PPG consistently overestimated ejection times by a mean difference of +95 ms. Moreover, eleven PPG parameters significantly correlated with key echocardiographic indicators of systolic and diastolic function, such as left ventricular dimensions, global longitudinal strain, aortic functionality, atrial contraction (MV-A), and ventricular filling pressure (E/e' lat) with clinical relevance indicated by correlations (r) above 0.4 (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The findings pave the way for further studies in various patient groups to explore the potential of PPG in enhancing home monitoring and regular cardiovascular assessments. This work not only broadens our understanding of the physiological relationships between peripheral and central cardiovascular measures but also introduces innovative metrics that might bring some added value to the current standards of patient care by facilitating early detection and personalized management of heart conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2060.2025.00675DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac function
8
evaluating photoplethysmography-based
4
photoplethysmography-based pulsewave
4
pulsewave parameters
4
parameters composite
4
composite scores
4
scores for assessment
4
for assessment cardiac
4
function comparison
4
comparison echocardiography
4

Similar Publications